Livestock Research for Rural Development 32 (8) 2020 LRRD Search LRRD Misssion Guide for preparation of papers LRRD Newsletter

Citation of this paper

Studies on intestinal ecology and growth performance of Tegal ducks fed with Lactobacillus casei and porang (Amorphophallus oncophyllus) tuber extract

Istna Mangisah1,2, Lilik Krismiyanto1, Vitus Dwi Yunianto Budi Ismadi1, Mulyono Mulyono1, Bambang Sukamto1, Fajar Wahyono1 and Nyoman Suthama1

1 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Central Java, Indonesia
istnamangisah@yahoo.co.id
2 Vocational School, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia Central Java, Indonesia

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate the effect of a mixture of Lactobacillus casei and porang tuber extracts (LCP) on intestinal microbial population and ecology, immune organs and growth performance of Tegal duck. A total of 150 of 4-weeks-old male Tegal duck were allotted to 3 dietary treatments, i.e. LCP0: Basal feed; LCP1: basal feed + 1ml LCP/100 g feed, LCP2: basal feed + 2ml LCP/100 g feed. The observed variables included intestinal microbial numbers, weight of digestive organs, weight of lymphoid organ and growth performance.

The mixture of Lactobacillus casei and glucomannan from porang tuber extract improved intestinal ecology, increased the weight of the immune organ “bursa of Fabricius” and improved growth and feed conversion.

Keywords: additive, coliform, lactic acid bacteria, symbiotic, villi height


Introduction

Eggs and meat of ducks provide a relatively affordable and available animal protein for consumers. One of the native or indigenous duck breeds that developed in Indonesia as meat and egg producer is called Tegal duck. They can be marketed at 7 to 10 weeks old according to consumer needs, because the meat at that age has the best quality (Iriyanti et al 2018).

Raising Tegal ducks of either traditional or semi-intensive system and provided with a poor quality diet leads to low productivity (Mangisah et al 2009). Feeding additive in the form of a combination of probiotics and prebiotics is a possible effort that can be applied to improve duck production performance. Lactobacillus as a probiotic could stimulate microorganisms capable in modifying the gastrointestinal condition through the improvement the growth of nonpathogenic and gram positive bacteria. These bacteria are able to produce lactic acid and hydrogen peroxide that can impact on the suppression of the growth of intestinal pathogens and provide a favorable condition to increase the digestion and utilization of nutrients, and feed efficiency. Previous studies indicated that dietary addition of probiotic Lactobacillus sp. was effective in increasing lactic acid bacteria population and decreasing total Coliform in the intestine of broilers (Cholis et al 2018; Sugiharto 2016). The beneficial effect of Lactobacillus sp. combined with ginger and turmeric extracts was also reported to be effective in lowering Escherichia coli counts and in increasing lactic acid bacteria population and antioxidant status (GSH-Px and SOD) of broiler fed self-formulated diet (Risdianto et al 2019). It was likely that Lactobacillus sp. can exert its positive impact on host animals with several states of diet condition. As it has been previously stated by Saputra et al (2020) that inclusion of Lactobacillus acidophilus in broiler diet composed of low level (18%) protein enhanced total lactic acid bacteria and depressed coliform counts due to the increased production of short chain fatty acid.

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) require a source of "feed" in the form of prebiotics that can be fermented to produce lactic acid and short chain fatty acids (SCFA). These metabolites or products bring about the change in gut condition profile with reference to the balance improvement of intestinal microflora. This physiological phenomenon is closely related to the healthier environment of the digestive tract. One potential prebiotic that is widely used as “feed source” for Lactobacillus is known as glucomannan. Glucomannan can be found from “porang” tuber flour ( Amorphophallus oncophlus) at a level of 41% (Ngatirah and Syaflan 2016). The extraction of porang powder by maceration and ethanol leaching procedure produced the highest glucomannan and the lowest oxalate levels (Wijanarko, 2011).

Previous studies indicated that supplementation of probiotics and prebiotics can improve the performance of broilers (Salim et al 2013; Bozkurt et al 2014; Yuanita et al 2019; Setyaningrum et al 2019). Diet added with glucomannan alone extracted from porang tuber at 1.2% increased lactic acid bacteria population, decreased total Coliform, and improved body resistance of broiler chickens indicated by lower H/L ratio (Perdinan et al 2019). To date, very few studies have been comprehensively carried out to investigate the effect of feeding the mixture of Lactobacillus casei and porang tuber extract in poultry. For this reason, the current study was conducted to evaluate the effect of dietary inclusion of Lactobacillus casei and porang tuber extract mixture on intestinal bacteria population, weights of immune and digestive organs, intestinal villi height, and growth performance of male Tegal ducks.


Materials and methods

Ethical approval

The current study was carried out as a part of the Institute Research Project and the protocol was based on the rule of animal treating as appointed in the Republic of Indonesia’s law number 41, 2014.

Preparation of a mixture of LCP

The study was started with the extraction of porang tuber powder to obtain glucomannan based on the slightly modified method of Setyawati et al (2017). Porang tubers were harvested at ten month old, cleaned, sliced, dried and ground. Porang tuber powder (50g) was put in beaker glass containing distilled water with a ratio of 1:30 (w/v), and then was stirred using a homogenizer at 700 rpm for 15 minutes.

The mixture was continuously stirred at the temperature of 95ºC for 120 minutes. The mixture formed was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes to get the filtrate. The filtrate containing component of glucomannan was separated by filter paper. The precipatates of glucomannan were washed with 95% ethanol and were oven dried at 40 ºC for 24 hours. The dried glucomannan was ready to be used for LCP preparation, thereafter.

LCP was prepared by mixing Lactobacillus casei (109 cfu/g) in 50 ml of 10% skim milk (10 g skim milk in 100 ml of sterile distilled water) and was incubated for 2 x 24 hours at 37oC. Then, 50 ml of liquid mixture containing Lactobacillus casei was added with 2% (w/v) of sterilized porang tuber extract and was re-incubated for 2 x 24 hours to produce LCP. The bacterial population in LCP was counted with total plate count (TPC) method (Usman et al 2018).

Experimental animals and feeds

One hundred and fifty male Tegal ducks (age 30 days, with an average weight of 631±26 g were obtained from Livestock Breeding Center, Livestock Service Office, Central Java Province, Indonesia. The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized design comprising 3 treatments with 5 replications, and 10 ducks per replication. Treatments were addition of LCP extract (LCP0, LCP1 and LCP2) at 0, 1 and 2ml/g of feed (fresh matter basis). The basal diet was formulated according to the requirements recommended by Indonesian National Standards (SNI) SNI 8508:2018. The ration was prepared using maize, rice bran, soybean meal, meat and bone meal and premix (Table 1). The feed mixture was analyzed for its proximate composition using the AOAC methods (2007).

The ducks were adapted to the experimental diets from 15 to 30 days old and measurements made from 31 to 58 days old. Feed and water were given ad libitum.

Table 1. Composition and nutrient contents of basal diet

Ingredient

% air-dry basis

Corn

59

Rice bran

15

Soybean meal

19.25

MBM

5

CaCO3

1

premix

0.5

Total

100

Nutrient

% in DM

Metabolizable energy (kcal/kg)

3037

Crude protein

18.2

Crude fiber

6.97

Ether extract

5.88

Calcium

1.07

Phosphorus

0.68

Methionine

0.42

Lysine

1.31

Parameters measured
Gastrointestinal tract and immune organs

At the end of treatment, the ducks were were fasted for 15 hours then slaughtered by cutting their jugular veins. The small intestine (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum), caecum and colon were excised and weighed. Immune organs (spleen, thymus and bursa of fabricius) were removed and weighed.

Lactic acid bacteria and coliforms in the small intestine

Digesta (for pH, LAB and coliform determinations) was collected from the slaughtered ducks. pH values of intestine were determined according to Nabizadeh (2012). One gram of fresh digesta sample diluted into10 ml of distilled water was measured using a pH meter “smart Sensor pH 818”. Microbial population in the cecum (lactic acid bacteria and coliforms) was measured based on the method of Peng et al (2016), in which one gram digesta was transferred to 9 ml of sterile physiological saline solution, homogenized and diluted up to 10-8. The suspensions were plated in de Man Rogosa and Sharpe Agar (MRSA) and incubated anaerobically at 37ºC for 48 h for the enumeration of lactic acid bacteria. For the enumeration of coliform, the homogenized samples were diluted up to 10-6, then plated in McConkey Agar and incubated anaerobically at 37 ºC for 24 h.

Villi height of intestine

Observations of villi height (VH) were according to Setyaningrum et al (2019) with some modification. Specimens of intestine were cut around 2 cm, fixed in a 10% neutral buffer formalin solution for 2 days, dehydrated and then embedded in paraffin. The sections were cut at 4 µm and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Villus height were measured under Leica ICC50HD microscope (4x magnification) with Leica Application Suite version 3.4.0 software. The height of the villi was measured from the end of villi to the intersection between villi - crypt.

Growth performance

Final (live) body weight was recorded at the end of the study after weighing weekly. Feed conversion ratio was calculated from the average of daily feed consumption divided by daily body weight gain

Statistical analysis

Treatment means were subjected to analysis of variance and the difference of means value was compared using SAS software based on Duncan’s procedure test.


Results

Gastrointestinal tract

Villi height was increased by LCP1 treatment but not by LCP2 (Table 2). The weight of ileum was increased with a curvilinear trend as LCP level was increased (Figure 1). The relative weights of duodenum, jejunum, caecum and colon were not affected by LCP supplementation.

Table 2. Gastrointestinal weight and villi height of intestine

Treatments

SEM

p

LCP0

LCP1

LCP2

Duodenum (%)

0.41

0.44

0.42

0.01

0.101

Jejunum (%)

0.84

0.86

0.83

0.01

0.388

Ileum (%)

0.79b

0.90a

0.93a

0.02

0.001

Cecum (%)

0.24

0.24

0.23

0.004

0.056

Colon (%)

0.23

0.26

0.24

0.008

0.127

Villi height( (µm)

868b

957a

878ab

10.91

0.001

abc Means in the same row without common superscript differ at p<0.05

Intestinal microbes

LCP increased LAB population, decreased Coliforms and decreased the pH of the intestine (Table 3).

Table 3. Populations of lactic acid bacteria (LAB), coliform and intestinal pH

Variables

Treatments

SEM

p

LCP0

LCP1

LCP2

LAB (109 cfu/g)

2.6b

41a

16a

4.39

0.001

Coliforms (106 cfu/g)

39a

1.63b

4.5b

4.61

0.001

pH

6.15b

5.35ba

5.55a

0.15

0.003

abc Means in the same row without common superscript differ at p <0.05

Immune organs

LCP increased the weights of thymus, bursa of fabricius (Figure 2) and spleen (Table 4).

Table 4. Mean values of immune organs of ducks that received diets supplemented with LCP

Treatments

SEM

p

LCP0

LCP1

LCP2

Slaughter LW, g

1207.8 2c

1325.45a

1298.55b

14.28

0.004

As % of slaughter live weight

Thymus

0.12b

0.18a

0.19a

0.009

0.002

Bursa of fabricius

0.59b

0.64a

0.722a

0.020

0.014

Spleen

0.12b

0.18a

0.17a

0.007

0.001

abc Means in the same row without common superscript differ at p <0.05



Figure 1. Effect of LCP supplementation on villi height Figure 2. Effect of LCP supplementation on weight of bursa
of Fabricius, % of slaughter live weight
Growth performance

The growth response to LCP was curvilinear increasing by 20% with addition of 1ml LCP/100g of diet, but with a lower rate of 15% improvement when the LCP was fed at 2ml/100g of diet (Table 5; Figure 3).

Table 5. Effect on growth performance of ducks of adding 1or 2% LCP to their diets

Treatments

SEM

p

LCP0

LCP1

LCP2

Live weight, g

Initial

632.2

632.5

627.9

2.4

0.052

Final

1208c

1329a

1296b

15.4

0.001

Daily gain

20.6b

24.9a

23.8a

0.63

0.005

Feed intake, g/d

76.94a

73.58b

73.22b

0.64

0.018

Feed conversion#

3.73b

2.95a

3.08a

0.09

0.001

#Feed intake/ live weight gainabc Means in the same row without common superscript differ at p<0.05



Figure 3. Effect of a dietary supplement of LCP
on live weight gain of ducks
Figure 4. Effect of a dietary supplement of LCP
on feed conversion of ducks

Discussion

Feed containing Lactobacillus casei and glucomannan from porang tuber extract (LCP) did not affect relative weight of duodenum, jejunum, caecum and colon (Table 2). This result is in accordance with Iriyanti et al (2018), that the intestinal profile weights percentage of intestine, gizzard, crop, and pancreas of ducks was not affected by prebiotic supplementation in feed. However, LCP supplementation increased the relative weight of the ileum. The increased ileum weight can be assumed that the condition much healthier than other segments due to the less pathogenic bacterial counts and higher growth of beneficial bacteria (LAB) in general (Table 3), although bacterial populations in the ileum did not specifically measured in the present study. It can be compared to the previous study that ileal LAB population decreased and E.coli counts decreased dramatically in crossbred local chickens fed prebiotic dahlia inulin (Krismiyanto et al 2014). Thus, this condition was possibly related to the change in microflora in the intestine leading to intestinal villi growth alteration (Table 3. Figure 1).

Dietary supplementation of Lactobacillus casei and glucomannan from porang tuber extract (LCP) provided beneficial effects on intestinal ecology and immune response in Tegal ducks. The change in intestinal ecology due to beneficial effect of supplementation of Lactobacillus casei and glucomannan from porang tuber extract mixture indicated by the increased total lactic acid bacteria and decreased coliform counts in the intestine (Table 3). Porang (Amorphophallus oncophyllus) tuber extract contains the same beneficial carbohydrate component as found in Amorphophallus konjac (KGM) known as glucomannan. Glucomannan with its carbohydrate component can be function as “source of feed/nutrition” for Lactobacillus casei in particular, and lactic acids bacteria in general. The presence of glucomannan can be fermented by Lactobacillus casei to produce short chain fatty acids (SCFA) which brought about the growth inhibition of pathogenic (coliform) and increased LAB population (Table 3). The present results were consistent with the previous reports in broiler fed a combination of Lactobacillus sp. and dahlia inulin (Cholis et al 2018), and inulin alone from dahlia tuber extract (Suthama et al 2019) that the intestinal bacteria changed to be the better balance with lower coliform and higher LAB populations.

There was not much known and was not specifically observed in the present study about the mode of action of mannose derived from MOS or glucomannan in reducing pathogens. However, it was reported that pathogens adhere to MOS particle in the form of mannose and are discarded (Sohail et al 2012; Spring et al 2000). Therefore, it can be briefly concluded that LCP supplementation can increase LAB population through the mechanisms of the two synergistic effects, Lactobacillus casei and glucomannan. The fermentation activity of Lactobacillus casei on glucomannan to produce SCFA that decreased coliform counts and increased LAB growth, was the indication of synergistic works of both. This result was supported by Perdinan et al (2019) who reported that dietary supplementation of glucomannan extracted from Amorphophallus oncophyllus tuber increased the BAL population, and decreased the number of coliform in the jejunum and ileum of broilers.

The results of study demonstrated a positive impact of feeding LCP that can increase intestinal villi height (Table 2). Villi height is an indication of greater surface area which in turn can increase nutrient digestibility and absorption capacity, and to a certain extent of intestinal health improvement. It was in accordance with the investigation of Purbarani et al (2019) that the increase in villi height induces the improvement of protein digestibility in crossbred local chicken fed diet with inclusion of a combination of Lactobacillus sp. and dahlia tuber inulin. Consistent with the present results, a previous study on feeding effect of inulin from gembili tuber and Lactobacillus plantarum demonstrated the increased villi height and the ratio of villi height to crypt depth in the duodenum, jejunum and ileum of broiler (Setyaningrum et al 2019). An increased intestinal villi height was associated with the changes in intestinal microbes due to dietary LCP supplementation. Intestinal microbial balance has a good effect on the growth of villi because LAB increased mucin production which protects intestinal epithelial cells from the toxins intervention that produced by pathogenic bacteria. This result was supported by the finding of Shirani et al (2019) that the increased microbial balance in GIT was an impact of intestinal pathogenic bacteria reduction, which caused intestinal structure and function improvement. The present study results are in line with Wang et al (2017) who found that supplementation of Lactobacillus plantarum increased villi height, villi height to depth of crypt in the jejunum.

In connection with the relative weights of the immune organs (spleen, bursa of fabricius and thymus), there was a significant increase in LCP treated groups as compared to control/LCP0 (Table 4; Figure 2). These results accordance with the finding of Willis et al (2007) and  Alkhaft et al (2010) that feeding probiotics in broilers increased the relative weight of spleen. The increase in the relative weight of bursa can be associated with the enhancement of immune cells number. The results found in this study were in agreement with Khan et al (2013) who found that bursa fabricius in the birds given probiotics showed an enhancement of the number of immune organ follicles. In relation to the weight changes in immune organs, it can be known that both bursa of fabricius and spleen weights increased (Table 4). The increased weight of spleen due to feeding effect of LCP can be still categorized in a state of good health condition. In case of the present study, the increased weight of spleen did not interfere with the health status since its work can be balanced by the role of bursa of fabricius. Thus, these results implied the positive feeding effect of Lactobacillus casei and glucomannan from porang tuber extract on the immune system improvement of Tegal duck.

The better villi growth indicated by villi height (Table 2), the greateris the  surface area for nutrient digestibility and absorption. The higher nutrient supply is an important key for growth performance improvement. The improvement of intestinal ecology and function of immune organs brought about the increased in final body weight and body weight gain (Table 5; Figure 3) with improved feed conversion (Table 5; Figure  4). This phenomenon was supported by the previous finding (Purbarani et al 2019) that feeding Lactobacillus sp. combined with dahlia tuber inulin improved villi height and protein digestibility, and finally brings about the increased carcass yield and final body weight. The lower level of LCP is considered to be the more appropriate since the growth improvement tended to decrease with the highest level of LCP (Figure 3).


Conclusion


Acknowledgments

This research project was funded by Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia through the Basic Research of Higher Education  , with contract No. 257-46/UN7.P4.3/PP/2019.


Reference

Alkhalf A, Alhaj M and Al-homidan I 2010 Influence of probiotic supplementation on immune response of broiler chicks. Egyptian Poultry Science Journal, 30(1):271-280. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235419794_Influence_of_probiotic_supplementation_on_immune_response_of_broiler_chicks

AOAC 2007 Official methods of analysis. AOAC Int. Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

Bozkurt M, Aysul N, KüçüKyilmaz K, Aypak S, Ege G, Çatli A U, Aksit H, Coven F, Seyrek K and Cinar M 2014 Efficacy of in-feed preparations of an anticoccidial, multienzyme, prebiotic, probiotic, and herbal essential oil mixture in healthy and Eimeria spp.-infected broilers. Poultry Science, 93(2):389-399. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579119360201?via%3Dihub

Cholis M A, Suthama N and Sukamto B 2018 Feeding microparticle protein diet combined with Lactobacillus sp. on existence of intestinal bacteria and growth of broiler chickens. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture, 43(3):265-271. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/jitaa/article/view/17717

Iriyanti N, Hartoyo B and Suhermiyati S 2018 Performance and intestinal profiles of Tegal duck fed ration supplemented with prebiotics. Tropical Animal Science Journal, 41(1):15-21. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/tasj/article/view/20946

Khan S H, Rehman A, Sardar R and Khawaja T 2013 The effect of probiotic supplementation on the growth performance, blood biochemistry and immune response of reciprocal F1 crossbred (Rhode Island Red×Fayoumi) cockerels. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 41(4). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09712119.2013.792732

Krismiyanto L, Suthama N and Wahyuni H I 2014 Feeding effect of inulin derived from dahlia variabilis tuber on intestinal microbes in starter period of crossbred native chickens. J. Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture, 39(4): 217-223. https://www . doi.org/10.14710/jitaa.39.4.217-223

Mangisah I, Sukamto B, and Nasution M H 2009 Implementation of fermented eceng gondok in duck ration. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture, 34: 127-133. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/16579/

Nabizadeh A 2012 The effect of inulin on broiler chicken intestinal microflora, gut morphology, and performance. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 21(4):725-734. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/66144/2012. http://www.jafs.com.pl/The-effect-of-inulin-on-broiler-chicken-intestinal-nmicroflora-gut-morphology-and-performance,66144,0,2.html

Ngatirah dan Syaflan M 2016 Suplementasi prebiotik dari iles-iles sebagai sumber karbon pada media MRS untuk pertumbuhan Lactobacillus casei. Agroteknose. 7(2):32-37. http://36.82.106.238:8885/jurnal/index.php/ATS/article/view/122

Peng Q, Zeng X F, Zhu J L, Wang S, Liu X T, Hou C L, Thacker P A and Qiao S Y 2016 Effects of dietary Lactobacillus plantarum B1 on growth performance, intestinal microbiota, and short chain fatty acid profiles in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 98(4):893-900. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev435

Perdinan A, Wahyuni H I, and Suthama N 2019 Body resistance and growth performance of broiler fed glucomannan extracted from Amorphophallus onchophyllus tuber. Tropical Animal Science Journal, 42(1):33-38. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/tasj/article/view/22817

Purbarani S A, Wahyuni H I and Suthama N 2019 Dahlia inulin and Lactobacillus sp. in step down protein diet on villi development and growth of KUB chickens. Tropical Animal Science Journal, 42 19-24. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2019.42.1.19

Risdianto D, Suthama N, Suprijatna E and Sunarso S 2019 Inclusion effect of ginger and turmeric mixture combined with Lactobacillus spp. isolated from rumen fluid of cattle on health status and growth of broiler. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture , 44(4):423-433. https://doi.org/10.14710/jitaa.44.4.423-433

Salim H M, Kang H K, Akter N, Kim D W, Kim J H, Kim M J, Na J C, Jong H B, Choi H C, Suh O S and Kim W K 2013 Supplementation of direct-fed microbials as an alternative to antibiotic on growth performance, immune responses, cecal microbial population, and ileal morphology of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 92(8):2084–2090. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003257911938811X?via%3Dihub

Saputra Y A, Suthama N and Sukamto B 2020 Feeding diets composed of low level microparticle protein derived from fish and soybean meals and using organic calcium added with Lactobacillus acidophilus or citric acid on intestinal condition and performance of broilers. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 32 (4). http://www.lrrd.org

Setyaningrum S, Yunianto V D, Sunarti D and Mahfudz L D 2019 The effect of synbiotic (inulin extracted from gembili tuber and Lactobacillus plantarum) on growth performance, intestinal ecology and haematological indices of broiler chicken. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 31(11). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd31/11/srise31177.html

Setyawati E, Bahri S and Razak A R 2017 Extraction of tuber porang glucomannan ( Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (Dennst.) Nicolson). KOVALEN, 3(3):234-241. https://bestjournal.untad.ac.id/index.php/kovalen/article/view/9332

Shirani V, Jazi V, Toghyani M, Ashayerizadeh A, Sharifii F and Barekatain R 2019 Pulicaria gnaphalodes powder in broiler diets: consequences for performance, gut health, antioxidant enzyme activity, and fatty acid profile. Poultry Science, 98 (6):2577-2587. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez010

Sibbald I R and Wolynetz S 1985 Estimates of retained nitrogen used to correct estimates of bioavailable energy. Poultry Science, 64: 1506-1513. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579119469137

Sohail M U, Hume M E, Byrd J A, Nisbet D J, Ijaz A, Sohail A, Shabbir M Z and Rehman H 2012 Effect of supplementation of prebiotic mannan-oligosaccharides and probiotic mixture on growth performance of broilers subjected to chronic heat stress. Poultry Science, 91 :2235–2240. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3382/ps.2012-02182

Spring P, Wenk C, Dawson K A, and Newman K E 2000 The effects of dietary mannanoligosaccharides on cecal parameters and the concentrations of enteric bacteria in the ceca of salmonella-challenged broiler chicks. Poultry Science 79:205–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.2.205 ·

Sugiharto S 2016 Role of nutraceuticals in gut health and growth performance of poultry. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 15:99-111. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1658077X1400037X

Suthama N, Sukamto B, Mangisah I 2019 Healthy meat production of broiler fed microparticle-protein diet with inclusion of inulin derived from dahlia tuber extract. International Conference on Food Science & Technology. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 292 (2019) 012066 IOP. https://iopscience.iop.org/issue/1755-1315/292/1

Usman N A, Suradi K and Gumilar J 2018 The effect of concentration lactic acid bacteria Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus casei on microbiology and chemestry properties of mayonnaise probiotic. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak, 18(2):79-85

Wang Y, Sun J, Zhong H, Li N, Xu H, Zhu Q and Liu Y 2017 Effect of probiotics on the meat flavour and gut microbiota of chicken. Scientific Reports, 7(1):6400. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5527115/

Widjanarko S B, Sutrisno A and Faridah A 2011 Effect of hydrogen peroxide of physicochemical properties of common konjac (Amorphophallus oncophyllus) flour by maceration and ultrasonic methods. Jurnal Teknologi Pertanian. 12(3):143-152. https://jtp.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtp/article/view/346

Willis W L, Isikhuemhen O S and Ibrahim S A 2007 Performance assessment of broiler chickens given mushroom extract alone or in combination with probiotics. Poultry Science, 86:1856-1860. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579119392090

Yuanita I, Sunarti D, Wahyuni H I and Suthama N 2019 Feeding Dayak onion (Eleutherine palmifolia) extract and Lactobacillus acidophilus mixture on blood biochemicals, meat quality characteristics and growth performance in broiler chickens. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 31(9). http://www.lrrd.org