Livestock Research for Rural Development 28 (1) 2016 Guide for preparation of papers LRRD Newsletter

Citation of this paper

Growth and reproductive performance of Fogera cattle breed at Andassa Livestock Research Center

Assemu Tesfa, Dilip Kumar1, Solomon Abegaz2, Getinet Mekuriaw1,3, Tewodross Bimerew, Adebabay Kebede, Addisu Bitew, Yeshewas Ferede, Hailu Mazengia1 and Mekonnen Tilahun

Andassa Livestock Research Center, P.O.Box 27 Bahir Dar, Ethiopia;
1 Bahir Dar University Colleges of Agriculture and Environmental Science, P.O.Box 5501 Bahir Dar, Ethiopia;
2 Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), P.O.Box 2003 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and
3 International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.O.Box 5689 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
assemu546@gmail.com

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate the growth and reproductive performances of Fogera cattle breed at Andassa Livestock Research Center, Ethiopia. The data covers the period from 1992 to 2013 that were collected from farm records of the center. The fixed effects were birth year, season, sex, parity, mating type and dam source.

 

The least squares means and standard errors of birth and weaning weight were 21.4±0.09 and 102±0.77 kg, respectively; whereas age at first service, age at first calving, calving interval and number of service per consumption were 38.9±0.72 month, 51.8±0.72 month, 19.5±0.32 month and 1.17±0.01, respectively. Weaning weight and other reproductive performance traits showed slight up and down trends across the years which indicated fluctuation of management and other husbandry practices at the center. Almost all the non-genetic factors considered in the study had an effect on the production and reproductive performances of the breed.

Keywords: Ethiopia, fixed effect, indigenous breeds


Introduction

The productivity of cattle depends largely on their reproductive performance and the rate of genetic progress in both selection and crossbreeding programs particularly in dairy and beef production (Nuraddis 2011). An important prerequisite for the sustainability of a dairy production system is that cows must have efficient reproductive performance (Asheber 1991; Tewodros 2008).

 

Performance of pre-weaning growth performance of dairy cattle includes birth weight, weaning weight and average daily weight gain. Growth rate remains the primary selection criterion for both beef and dairy herds (Habtamu et al 2012). Both birth and weaning weight have an influence on reproductive and productive performances (Mekonnen 1987; Gidey 2001; Aynalem 2006; Almaz 2012). Reproduction influences the rate of genetic progress in both selection and crossbreeding programs particularly in dairy and beef production (Mukassa-Mugerewa and Azage 1989). Reproductive efficiency is expressed by the extent of reduction of reproductive wastage and it affects lifetime milk and meat production (Nuraddis 2011). The reproductive performance of the breeding female is probably the single most important factor influencing herd/flock productivity (Azage and Alemu 1998). The expression, reproductive performance, does not usually refer to a single trait, but to a combination of many traits. Many authors indicate that the main indicators that would be considered in evaluating reproductive performance are age at first service, age at first calving, calving interval, days open and number of services per conception (Assemu and Dilip 2014).

 

Fogera cattle breed is among the 27 (Rege and Tawah 1999) recognized indigenous cattle breed in the Ethiopia, that is reared in districts found around Lake Tana, and is one of the main populated and productive breed in the region (Addisu et al 2010a) and in the country (DAGRIS 2007). Fogera cattle breed is kept at Andassa and Metekel ranches for the past 52 and 28 years, respectively. The two centers had been originally established for conserving the pure Fogera cattle breed and additionally they had a mandate to cross the breed with Holstein Friesian for increasing the milk supply of the region by distributing in-calf cross-heifers to the farmers of the region.

 

Works on the estimation of growth and reproductive performance traits for Fogera cattle has been done by Gebeyehu et al (2005). Additionally, non-genetic parameter estimation was also computed by Addisu (1999), Melaku et al (2011a and b) at Metekel ranch, while Alemseged and Chakravarty (2003) did it in Andassa Livestock Research Center. Even if these efforts are exerted to analyze the data, there is also additional data that needs further analysis to see the potential and improvement of the breed for the past ten years and the report acts as a supplementation or as guideline for the breeding program that the research center is going to proceed on Fogera cattle breed improvement. Therefore, the main objective of the study was to evaluate the growth and reproductive performances of Fogera cattle breed at Andassa Livestock Research Center.


Materials and methods

Description of Andassa Livestock Research Center

 

Andassa Livestock Research Center (ALRC), which has been conserving Fogera cattle breed for the past 5 to 6 decades, is found at 587 km Northwest of Addis Ababa, and 22 km South of Bahir Dar city, on the way to Blue Nile fall. The Center is situated at 11o29' North Latitude and 37o29' East Longitude with an elevation of 1730 m above sea level. It receives an average annual rainfall of 1150 mm with temperature ranging from 6.5oC to 30oC. The total area of the center is about 360 hectares out of which 310 are covered by pasture land; of these, 170 ha are used for continuous grazing whereas 140 ha are seasonally grazed or partially used for hay making. The rest 50 hectares are covered with bushes and different constructions. The topography of the area is marked by a flat-to-gentle slope that is bisected by Andassa River, a permanent water source for the animals. In general, the area is characterized by dark clay soil, which is seasonally water logged and cracked when dry.

 

Description of Fogera cattle breed

 

Fogera breed is characterized and well known by its pied coat of black-and-white or black-and-grey; short, stumpy, pointed horns; hump ranges from thoracic to cervico-thoracic; dewlap is folded and moderate to large in size; docile temperament; used for draught, milk and meat (Rege and Tawah 1999; DAGRIS 2007). The breed is known for its tolerance to high altitudes, parasite and disease infestation, fly burden, wet soils or swampy areas, low quality of feed and other unfavorable environmental conditions (Alberro and Haile-Mariam 1982). Fogera cattle breed are generally large, being tall with long legs. A massive body with solid strong bones is one of the breed’s main features (DAGRIS 2007). Alberro and Haile-Mariam (1982), classified Fogera cattle breed as an intermediate Zebu-Sanga type, which is developed out of interbreeding of Abyssinian Zebu from central highlands and the adjacent Sanga (Danakil, Raya-Azebo).

Figure 1. Fogera cattle breed: weaned female calves (left) and bull (right) at ALRC

Data source

 

The data for this study were sourced from farm records of Andassa livestock research center that has collected by cattle registration card and performance record format, which covers from 1992 to 2013. All the available data which were compiled by individual card and case book of the center were filtered, and crosschecked for its consistency and informativeness. Those data targeted to reproductive performance and pre-weaning growth were further extracted and filtered for analysis.

 

Data management and statistical analysis 

 

The performance data were collected from the case books for milked cattle. Records with unknown sire and dam were removed. Parity was classified as 1, 2, 3, 4 and ≥5 and because of small number of observations; parities above six were included and considered as ≥5. The fixed effect of calving/birth season was classified as wet (June – September) and dry (October – May) (Gebeyehu 2005; Addisu et al 2010b). Data’s recorded above five year for age at first calving (AFC), above two year for calving interval (CI), above four inseminations for number of service per conception (NSC) were excluded from analysis (Hailemariam and Kassa 1994; Oyamaet al 2004; Wasike 2006; Getinet et al 2009; Almaz 2012). Based on number of observations, year was classified for seven categories for BW, WW and NSC; five categories for AFS, six categories for AFC and CI. With this, 1520 animals for birth weight, 1344 animals for weaning weight, 142 animals for AFS, 223 animals for AFC, 251 animals for CI and 620 animals for NSC were used for analysis.

 

General linear model procedures of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS 2002) were used to determine the effects of non-genetic factors such as birth year, season, sex, parity, mating type and dam source on the selected economic traits. The presence of any significant differences was checked by using TUKEY Kramer multiple comparison tests. The non-genetic factors used in these data comprised of year (1992 to 2013), season (dry and wet season), sex (male and female), parity (1, 2, 3, 4 and ≥5), dam source (farm born and purchased) for CI and NSC and type of mating (bull mating and AI) for NSC were included.

 

Model 1: For growth performance traits (BW and WW)

 

Yijklm = µ + Ai + Sj + Xk + Pl + eijklm

 

Where, Yijklm   = mth record of ith year,jth season, kth sex and lth parity

             µ         = overall mean

             Ai          = effect of ith year of birth

             Sj         = effect of jth season of birth

             Xk          = effect of kth sex

Pl        = effect of lth parity of dam

eijklm     = random error associated with each observation

 

Model 2: For reproductive traits (AFS, AFC, CI and NSC)

 

Yijkl= µ + Ai + Sj+ Pk + Dl + Tm + eijklmn

 

Where, Yijklmn   =nth record of ith year, jth season, kth parity, lth dam source and mth type of mating

             µ         = overall mean

Ai         = effect of ith year of birth

Sj          = effect of jth season of birth

Pk         = effect of kth parity of dam

Dl         = effect of lth dam source (for CI and NSC)

Tm          = effect of lth type of mating (for NSC)

             eijklmn    = random error associated with each observation


Result and Discussion

Pre-weaning growth

 

Birth weight

 

The overall mean birth weight of Fogera cattle breed calves was 21.4±0.09 kg (Table 1). The result was lower than the value of 23.1±0.27 kg reported by Asheber (1991) and 22.5±0.17 kg Addisu (1999) from previous works on the same breed. Other studies have reported comaparble estimates for the same breed (21.1±0.1 kg, Giday 2001; 21.2 kg, Alemseged and Chakravarty 2003; and 22kg, Addisu et al 2010). Additionally, the result is higher than the result of 21±0.03 kg (Almaz 2012) and lower than 21.5kg (MFBCMR 2013) at Metekel Fogera cattle conservation ranch. The variation between authors for the same breed might be due to site and structure of the data compilation, year difference (further having a variation in feed availability and related managerial differences), and differences in the way of data clearing.

 

The current result is lower than birth weight of 25.2kg (Mekonnen 1987), 26.6kg (Yohannes et al 2001), 23.7 (Amsalu 2003), and 23.3±0.36kg (Aynalem et al 2010) for Ethiopian Boran. This might be due to the difference of the nature of the breeds in which Boran had been reported to be adapted for meat type and considerable attention given for Boran breed conservation and improvement in the past. Similarly the result is lower than birth weight of Ogaden breed of 21.5±0.29kg (Getinet et al 2009), Mahibere-Slassie composite cattle breed 24.5±2.9 (Zewdu et al 2004). The result is higher than birth weight of Horro breed which was reported as 17.2±2.25kg (Demissu et al 2013).

 

The least squares mean analysis indicated that there was significant difference (p<0.001) between sex; male calves were heavier  by 0.92kg than female calves; which might be due to the physiological difference between male and females calves. This difference was inline with the results reported by various scholars (Addisu 1999; Asheber 1992; Gidey 2001; Melaku et al 2011a and Almaz 2012) for Fogera cattle breed. In addition, season of birth had shown significant difference and calves born during dry season had 0.71kg over those of wet season. This increment was due to that dams giving birth during dry season had better nutrition from the wet season grazing land for fetus development. This result was in line with reports from previous studies on the same breed (Asheber, 1992; Addisu, 1999; Giday, 2001; Melakuet al 2011a; Almaz 2012). Other reports had also shown significant effect of season on birth weight (Habtamu et al 2010; Aynalem et al 2010 and Demissu et al 2013). Non-significance effect of season on birth weight was reported by Mekonnen (1987) for Boran; Getinet et al (2009) for Ogaden and Addisu et al (2010) for Fogera cattle breed.

 

Parity of the dam had shown non-significant (p>0.05) effect on the birth weight of Fogera cattle breed at Andassa livestock research center. Similar results were reported by Addisu et al (2010) and Melaku et al (2011a) for the same breed. A significant effect of parity of dam on BW was reported by Asheber (1992), Giday (2001), Addisu and Hegde (2003), and Almaz (2012) for Fogera cattle breed and Getinet et al (2009) for Ogaden breed, and Demissu et al (2013) for Horro breed. Year of birth had shown a significant effect on birth weight of calves (p<0.001). Similar results were reported by different authors (Giday 2001; Amsalu 2003; Getinet et al 2009; Melaku et al 2011a; Almaz 2012; and Demissu et al 2013). 

 

Weaning weight

 

The overall mean of weaning weight at eight months (mean weaning age of calves at ALRC) of Fogera calves was 102.2±0.77kg (Table 1). This result is higher than the report of 99.9±3.92kg (Asheber 1992), 100.9±0.8kg (Giday 2001) and 97kg (Alemseged  and Chakravarty 2003) for Fogera cattle breed calves at ALRC and 88.6±0.33kg (Almaz 2012) at Metekel ranch and lower than the report of 114±1.9kg (Addisu 1999) and 122.8kg (MFBCMR 2013) for Fogera cattle breed. The higher value of this study might be attributed to the special care and management of the calves for making them as a replacement nucleus herd, improvement of the herd breeding system after the reintroduction of expected pure Fogera cattle breeds from their home track since 2008 due to the inbreeding observed till 2006 (Getinet 2006).

 

The result of the present study is also higher than the reports of Amsalu 2003 (94.2±3.9kg), Yohannes et al 2001 (79.4± 2.7kg), Aynalem et al 2010 (79.0±1.51kg) for Ethiopian Boran breed, Zewdu et al 2004 (102±6.89kg) for Mahibere-Slassie composite cattle breed and Getinet et al 2009 (91.7±1.67kg) for Ogaden breed at six months of age; this difference might be due to the weaning age and production objective difference of the breeds.

 

Sex of the calf had shown a significant (p<0.001) effect on the weaning weight of Fogera calves. Female calves had better weaning weight than male calves, which might be due to the special care of female calves to make them as a replacement nucleus herd. The present study is in line with Almaz (2012), Mekonnen (1987), and Getinet et al (2009) for Fogera, Boran and Ogaden breed, respectively. A non-significant effect of sex on weaning weight of Fogera calves was reported by Asheber (1992), Adissu (1999), Giday (2001), and Melaku et al (2011).

 

Season of birth had a significant (p<0.001) effect on weaning weight of Fogera calves. Calves born during wet season had additional weight over calves born during dry season. This might be due to the availability of optional feed resource during wet season, which are palatable and digestible for the calves. Additionally, the dams of calve had also got better feed during wet season to nourish milk for their calves in turn allowing calves to get additional weight. Similarly, Asheber (1992), Addisu (1999), Melaku et al (2011a), Almaz (2012), and Belay (2014) reported significant effect of season on weaning weight of calves for Fogera cattle breed and Mekonnen (1987) for Boran breed.

 

Parity had shown a non-significant effect on weaning weight of calves. But from the LSM in Table 1, there is observable increment in weaning weight from parity one to five, which might be related with the advancement of reproductive physiology of the cows across parity. In contrary, a significant effect of parity on weaning weight of Fogera cattle was reported by Asheber (1992), Addisu (1999), Giday (2001), Getinetet al (2009) and Almaz (2012). Year of birth had shown highly significant (p<0.001) influence on weaning weight of Fogera cattle breed calves. Similarly, the present study is in line with the result obtained for the same breed of cattle (Asheber 1992; Addisu 1999; Giday 2001; Melaku et al 2011a and Almaz 2012). Additionally, similar results of significant effect of year on weaning weight were reported for other Ethiopian breeds of cattle (Mekonnen 1987; Getinet et al 2009).

Table 1. Least squares means and standard error (LSM ± SE) of BW and WW (Kg)

Factors

Birth weight

Weaning weight

N

LSM ± SE

N

LSM ± SE

Overall

1519

21.4±0.09

1343

102±0.77

CV (%)

10.96

18.51

Sex


Male

702

21.8±0.11

628

98.91±0.95

Female

817

20.9±0.10

715

105.42±0.90

Season


Dry

1152

21.7±0.09

1002

98.0±0.81

Wet

367

21±0.14

341

106.3±1.16

Parity


1

61

21.8±0.33

49

105.8±3.38

2

45

21.2±0.38

36

112.8±3.74

3

44

21.8±0.39

44

110.3±3.36

4

44

21±0.39

41

110.9±3.48

≥5

18

20.9±0.61

18

110.5±4.75

Year


1992-1994

35

22.7±0.45a

34

98±3.98bc

1995-1997

94

22±0.32ab

94

96.7±2.00c

1998-2000

395

21.6±0.14b

379

98.9±1.00b

2001-2003

287

21.8±0.11ab

244

99±1.43b

2004-2006

253

23.3±0.13a

187

96.9±1.99bc

2007-2009

218

19.2±0.22c

180

94.6±1.84c

2010-2013

237

19.3±0.13c

225

110.3±0.95a

N= number of observation; abc Means in the same column without common letter are different at P<0.05

 The trend of birth weight and weaning weight of Fogera cattle breed at the research center had shown a considerable decrement across the advancement of year (Table 1). The decreasing trend might be due to deterioration of the production environments (feed quality and seasonality; and disease prevalence), lack of care and facility improvement for the center, unavailability of continuous concentrate feed supply for dams and poor recording system. Additionally, the shift of the ranch to the research center without any facility and feeding strategy, increasing the cattle population trend and invasion of the grazing land by unpalatable weeds, and absence of strategic selection mechanism favors for the declining trend. On top of this, the occurrence of inbreeding in the nucleus herd during 2006 (Getinet, 2006) contributed to the declining trend of birth and weaning weight of Fogera calves at the research center.

 

Reproductive performance

 

Age at first service

 

The overall mean of age at first service was 38.9±0.72 months (Table 2) with CV of 11.8%. The present result was lower than the report of 44.8 months (Gidey 2001) and 45.4±1.2 months (Gebeyehu et al 2005) for Fogera cattle breed and 43.5±11.19month (on-station) and 43.3±12.62months (on-farm) for Horro breed (Demissu et al 2013), 40.2±6.06 months (Tewodross 2008), and 42.24 months (Adebabay 2009). The result is higher than the report of 37.5±0.9 months (Habib 2011), 29.6 months (Shiferaw et al 2003), 34.4±2.28 months for Ogaden breed (Getinet et al 2009), 33.3±0.83 (Yosef 2006), 28.7±0.7 months for Ethiopian Boran breed (Aynalem 2006), 24.9±3.8 (Dinka 2012), 24.3±8.01 (Belay et al 2012). In comparison with the previous works done on the same breed, the present study had shown a considerable improvement that might be due to the selection of replacement heifers from weaned female calves based on their weight gain and health status and special care for them to make a replacement herd of the nucleus breeding herd of the center.

 

Season had shown a significant (p<0.05) effect on AFS. On the contrary a non-significant influence of season on AFS was reported by Gebeyehu et al (2005) and Belay (2014) for Fogera cattle breed and Yosef (2006) and Aynalem (2006) for Ethiopian Boran breed. Birth year had shown a significant (p<0.001) effect on AFS. Similar results for significant effect of year on age at first service were reported by Yosef (2006), Aynalem (2006), and Belay (2014).

 

Age at first calving

 

The overall least square mean of age at first calving was 51.8±0.72 months (Table 2). The present result is higher than the reports of Addisu 1999 (47.6 months) for on-station (ALRC) and Addisu et al 2007 (49.3 months) for on-farm Fogera cattle breed, and 39 month (MFBCMR 2013) for Fogera cattle breed at Metekel ranch. It is comparable with 50.8±0.36 (Melaku et al 2011b); and lower than 53.8 months (Asheber 1992), 54.6±0.4 months (Giday 2001), 52.4±0.17 months (Almaz 2012) and 52.3±1.77 months (Belay 2014) for Fogera cattle breed. However, the result is significantly higher than 38.8±6.9 months for Fogera cattle breed (Mekonnen and Goshu 1987), 30.3 month for Barka breed (Hailemariam and Mekonnen 1996), 32.8±0.9 month for Arsi breed (Enyew et al 1998), 38±2.24 months for Mahibere-Sellasie composite breed (Zewdu et al 2004), 43.8±4.2 months for local zebu (Million et al 2006), and 46.1 months for Metema highland zebu breeds (Tesfaye 2008). Higher values for age at first calving than the current study were reported for Highland zebu (53 months, Niraj et al 2014), (53.5±9.98 months, Tewodross 2008), (57.1 months, Yitay et al 2009), and (57.6 months, Yifat et al 2012).The wide variation for AFC between different indigenous breed of Ethiopia might be due to the breed difference (genotype effect), management variation and adaptation variations of the breeds at their production environment.

 

Season of birth had no significant (p>0.05) effect on age at first calving of Fogera cattle breed heifers. It might be due to the breeding season of the research center had naturally synchronized to a specific seasons in relation to feed availability (mainly three months during September to December). Similarly, a non-significant effect of season on age at first calving were reported by Addisu and Hegde (2003), Aynalem et al (2009), Getinet et al (2009), Habtamu et al (2010), Melaku et al (2011b), Almaz, (2012) and Belay (2014). However, Gebeyehu (1999) and Million et al (2006) report significant effect of season on age at first calving. Parity had a significant (p<0.05) effect on age at first calving of Fogera cattle breed and similar result was reported by Getinet (2009), however, a non-significant effect of parity had been reported by Almaz (2012).

 

Year of birth had a significant (p<0.01) effect on age at first calving. AFC had shown an improvement through the advance of year (Figure 2), which might be mainly due to the introduction of  cattle of Fogera phenotype after the occurrence of inbreeding in the existing herd and the design of strategic culling based on the performance traits (which was previously based on the color appearance alone). Significant effect of year on age at first calving was also reported by Gebeyehu (1999), Addisu and Hegde (2003), Melaku et al (2011b), Almaz (2012), Belay (2014) for Fogera cattle breed, Melaku (2003) and Mohammed (2004), Hailu and Tadele (2003), and Haileyesus (2006). However, Enyew et al (1998) and Million et al (2006) found non-significant effect of year on age at first calving.

 

Calving interval

 

The overall mean calving interval of Fogera cattle breed at ALRC was 19.5±0.32 months (Table 2), which is within the estimated calving interval for zebu cattle ranging from 12.2 to 26.6 months (Mukassa-Mugrewa 1989; Gebrekidan et al 2012). The present result is comparable with 19.37 months (Almaz 2012), 19.6 months (Melaku et al 2011b), 19.9 months (MFBCMR 2013), 20.1 months (Addisu et al 2007) and higher than 15.1±3.53 (Mekonnen and Gebeyehu 1987) and 18.7 months (Giday 2001) for Fogera cattle breed. The result was also comparable with 18.3±0.44 months (Azage et al 2009) for highland zebu cows in Metema district, 19.8 month (Derese 2008) and 21.24 months (Chencha et al 2012) for the indigenous cattle of West Shoa and Gamo Goffa zone, respectively. The current study was also higher than the respective report of 13.7 and 13.9 months for Arsi and Zebu breed (Enyew et al 1998), 13.9 months (Million et al 2006), 14.6 months for Boran breed (Aynalem et al 2009), and 13.5±0.23 months (Oumer et al 2013) for Indigenous breed at Jimma. The result is lower than 22 months for Horro breed (Demissu et al 2013), 22.3 months (Addis et al 2011), 23.1 months (Yitay et al 2009), 22.2 months (Gebrekidan et al 2012) and 22.2±7.73 months (Belay et al 2012).

 

The present result for CI is longer than the ideal value of one year interval which might be due to nutritional conditions that vary seasonally, and poor management (feeding, housing and health follow-ups). Seasonal availability and poor quality of feed, poor management, poor cycle control techniques, difficulties in estrous detection, silent heats and long DO were reported to be reasons for longer calving interval of Fogera cattle breed (Addisu and Prabhakar 2004; Melaku et al 2011b; Almaz 2012). In addition, occurrence of silent and night heats and short heat periods are common phenomena among zebu cows those attribute for the extended calving interval (De Vries 2006; Tewodros 2008; Melaku et al 2011b).

 

Source of dam shows significant (p<0.05) effect on calving interval in Fogera cattle breed, and dams born at the research center had shown short calving interval than purchased dams. This difference might be due to the considerable better management for the farm born dams. A non-significant effect of dam source on calving interval was reported by Getinet et al (2009) for Ogaden breed.

 

Parity of the cow had shown a significant (p<0.01) effect on calving interval; cows with higher parity had shown the shortest calving interval. This might be due to the improvement and physiological maturity of reproductive organs to conceive with a single insemination/mating. Similar result was reported by Gebeyehu (1999), Melaku et al (2011b), Almaz (2012), Addisu and Hegde (2003), Hailu and Tadele (2003), Demeke et al (2004), Ababu et al (2006), Million et al (2006), Yosef (2006), Aynalem et al (2009), Melaku et al (2011b), Niraj et al (2014) and Demissu et al (2013). Non-significant effect of parity on CI was reported by Belay (2014), Mekonnen and Goshu (1996).

 

Year of calving had a significant effect on Calving interval of Fogera cattle breed cow. Variation across year might be due to the attention given for the research for improvement of Fogera cattle breed and the improvements of management to the breeding cows. This significant effect of year on calving interval is in line with Addisu and Hegde (2003), Melaku et al (2011b), and Almaz (2012) for Fogera cattle breed and Enyew et al (1998), Mekonnen and Goshu (1996), Million et al (2006), Gebeyehu (1999), Getinet et al (2009). However, contradict result was reported by Mekonnen (1987) and Belay (2014).

 

The trend of calving interval across years (Figure 2) indicates a lowering trend through the advancement of year; this might be attributed to the improvements of management for breeding nucleus cow and the restructure of the herd after the onset of inbreeding in each herd of the center.

Figure 2. The trend of Calving interval across years
Number of service per consumption (NSC)

 

The overall mean NSC of the Fogera cattle breed at ALRC was 1.2±0.01 (Table 2). The result was lower than the report of 1.4±0.11 (Mekonnen and Goshu 1987), 1.5 (Giday 2001), 1.6±0.1 (Gebeyehu et al 2005), and 1.3±0.06 (Melaku et al 2011b) for Fogera cattle breed. The lowered result for NSC might be attributed to the efficiency of timely insemination at the onset of heat and the mating ability (libido) of the bulls used for natural mating. Comparable result of 1.1 for Barka breed was reported by Haile-Mariam and Mekonen (1996); significantly higher result of 1.5 was reported (Kefelegn et al 2013), 1.5±0.69 (Tewodros, 2008), 1.8 (Haile-Mariam and Kassamersha 1994), 2.0 for local breeds of North western Ethiopia (Yitay et al 2009), 2.1±1.1 for Horro breed (Demissu et al 2013), and 2.2 (Niraj et al 2014).

Table 2. Least squares means and standard error (LSM ± SE) of reproductive performance traits

Factors

AFC

AFC

CI

NSC

N

LSM ± SE

N

LSM ± SE

N

LSM ± SE

N

LSM ± SE

Overall

209

38.93±0.72

223

51.76 ± 0.72

251

19.53±0.32

619

1.17±0.01

CV (%)

11.79

11.87

17.80

29.98

Season

Dry

153

39.8±0.70

184

51±0.68

179

19.5±0.38

330

1.15±0.03

Wet

56

38±0.92

39

52.4±1.12

41

19±0.61

127

1.17±0.04

Dam

Farm

220

18.9±0.22

457

1.12±0.01

Purchased

31

20±0.60

162

1.22±0.03

Mating

Natural

456

1.11±0.01

AI

163

1.24±0.03

Parity

1

11

40.9±1.61a

67

53.5±1.06a

66

19±0.40ab

2

9

42.6±1.66a

45

52±1.17c

47

20±0.48a

3

22

38.5±1.05ab

47

53.4±1.10b

63

19.6±0.41ab

4

20

38.4±1.25ab

46

50±1.12cd

55

17.8±0.44b

≥5

13

35.7±1.48b

18

49.7±1.59d

20

17.8±0.74b

Year

1992-1994

8

54.4±1.80a

8

20.9±0.87a

15

1.00±0.00c

1995-1997

21

51.9±1.14ab

21

21.3±1.78a

129

1.09±0.02bc

1998-2000

52

38.3±0.74ab

83

49.4±0.60b

82

19±0.47ab

183

1.06±0.01c

2001-2003

96

40.7±0.46a

46

54.6±1.32a

45

17.9±0.54b

67

1.11±0.04b

2004-2006

36

38.3±0.82b

39

48.3±0.85b

36

19±0.55b

18

1.17±0.09b

2007-2008

9

40.7±0.90a

26

50.3±1.22ab

26

19.7±0.76ab

27

1.23±0.10a

2009-2011

16

38.8±1.04ab

18

1.26±0.09a

AFS=age at first service; AFC=age at first calving; CI= calving interval; NSC=number of service per conception
N= number of observations
abc Means in the same column without common letter are different at P<0.05

Season had shown non-significant effect on number of service per conception. Similarly, Mekonnen and Goshu (1987), Gebeyehu et al (2005), Demissu et al (2013), and Niraj et al (2014) reported a non-significant effect of season on NSC. Year of birth had shown a significant effect on NSC. Similar results on significant effect of year on NSC were reported by Gebeyehu Goshu et al (2005) and Niraj et al (2014) and on the contrary, non-significant effect of year on NSC had been reported by Mekonnen and Goshu (1987) and Melaku et al (2011b) for Fogera cattle breed.

 

Mating type had shown significant (p<0.001) effect on NSC. Lower value (1.1±0.01) for NSC is recorded for natural mating than AI group, which might be due the higher libido of the bulls to mate the dam and presence of bull at each cow herd. Additionally, dam source had shown significant effect on NSC and farm born dams had lower number of NSC than purchased dams, which might be due to management difference between the center and the farmer where the dams had sourced. The table below indicated the summary of significant level of each trait with the fixed effects considered.

Table 3. Summary of the effect of non-genetic factors on productive and reproductive
performance traits of Fogera cattle breed at ALRC

Factor

Traits

BW

WW

AFS

AFC

CI

NSC

Sex

***

***

Season

***

***

*

NS

NS

NS

Parity

NS

NS

*

*

**

Year

***

***

***

***

*

*

Dam source

*

**

Mating type

***

***P<0.001; **P< 0.01; *P<0.05; NS= Not Significant


Conclusion and recommendations


Acknowledgements

The author’s sincere appreciation goes to Andassa Livestock Research Center (ALRC) for kind permission of the long year on-station Fogera cattle breed data. The author’s extend their special thanks to Shigdaf Mekuriaw, Taddess Getu, Wondemagegn Mengesha and Tadele Habtu for their participation in data cleaning, and management to be ready for this paper.


References

Ababu D, Workneh A, Hedge, PB and ZerihunT 2006 Performance of the Abernosa Ranch in the Production of Ethiopian Boran X Holstein Crossbreed Dairy Heifers in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Animal Production 6(1): 33-5.

Addisu B 1999 Evaluation of reproductive and growth performance of Fogera cattle and their F1 Friesian crosses at Metekel ranch, Ethiopia. M.Sc. Thesis. Alemaya University of Agriculture, Alemaya, Ethiopia.

Addisu B and Hegde B P 2003 Evaluation of reproductive and growth performance of Fogera cattle and their F1-Friesian cross at Metekel Ranch, Ethiopia. Proceedings of the 10th annual conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP) held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. ESAP, Addis Ababa. Pp119-126.

Addisu B, Adebabay K, Bewuket S, Solomon G and Tewodros B 2010a Conservation-Based Breeding Program for Fogera Cattle.Working Document.Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute Andassa Livestock Research Center (unpublished papers).

Addisu B, Adebabay K, Bewuket S, Solomon G and Tewodros B 2010b Strategies for Sustainable Utilization of Fogera Cattle in Amhara Region.Strategic Document.Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute Andassa Livestock Research Center (unpublished papers).

Addisu B, Getinet M and Tezera M 2007 On-farm evaluation of management practices and productivity of Fogera cattle in Northwest Ethiopia. Proceedings of the 2nd annual regional conference on completed livestock research activities, Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute (ARARI), Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.

Addisu B, Mengistie T, Adebabay K, Getinet M, Asaminew T, Tezera M and Gebeyehu G 2010 Milk yield and calf growth performance of cattle under partial suckling system at Andassa Livestock Research Centre, North West Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 22 (8) 2010.

Addisu B, Mesfin B, Kindu M and Alan D 2011 Dairy intensification and milk market quality in Amhara region, Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, ILRI.

Adebabay K 2009 Characterization of Milk Production Systems, Marketing and On- FarmEvaluation of the Effect of Feed Supplementation on Milk Yield and Milk Composition of Cows at Bure District, Ethiopia.MSc Thesis, Bahir Dar University; Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.130 pp.

Albero M and Solomon H 1982 The indigenous cattle of Ethiopia Part-II. World AnimalReview, 41-42: 27-34.

Alberro M and Solomon H 1982 The indigenous cattle of Ethiopia. Part-I.World Animal Review, No. 41: 2-10.

Alemseged G and Chakravarty A K 2003 Breed, period and seasonal effect on performance traits of Fogera and F1 (Friesian x Fogera) crossbred cattle in Ethiopia. Journal of Dairying Foods & Home Sciences: ISSN: 0976-0563, Volume: 22, Issue: 1: 2003. Pp 24-29.

Almaz B 2012 Genetic parameter estimation of growth and reproduction traits of Fogera cattle at Metekel Ranch, Amhara Region, Ethiopia.MSc thesis, Bahir Dar University college of Agriculture and Environemntal science, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.Pp 108.

Amsalu S 2003 Growth performance of Boran cattle and their Friesian crosses in Ethiopia. Proceeding of 11th Annual conference of the Ethiopian Society Animal Production (ESAP).August 28-30, 2003. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Pp235.

Asheber S 1991 Evaluation of the reproductive and pre-weaning growth performance of Fogera cattle and their F1 Friesian cross at Andassa cattle breeding station, Ethiopia.MSc. Thesis.Alemaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.pp47.

Assemu T and Dilip K G 2014 Genetic and Non-Genetic Parameter Estimates of Dairy Cattle in Ethiopia: A Review.  Online J. Anim. Feed Res., 4(3): 83-90.

Aynalem H 2006 Genetic and economic analysis of Ethiopian Boran cattle and their crosses with Holstein Friesian in Central Ethiopia. A PhD dissertation in Animal Genetics and breeding. Haryana, India. Pp 196.

Aynalem H, Joshi B K, Workinehi A, Azage T and Singh A 2010 Genetic evaluation of Ethiopian Boran cattle and their crosses with Holstein Friesian for growth performance in central Ethiopia. J. Anim. Breed. Genet.ISSN 0931-2668.

Azage T and Alemu G 1998 Prospects for Peri-Urban Dairy Development in Ethiopia. In:  Fifth National Conference of ESAP (Ethiopian Society of Animal Production). ESAP, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Azage T, Eshete D, Hoekstra D, Worku T 2009 Matching Genotype with the Environment Using Indigenous Cattle Breed: Introduction of Borana Cattle from Southern Ethiopia into the Lowlands of North-Western Ethiopia. A paper presented at the FAO/IAEA Symposium on Sustainable Improvement of Animal Production and Health 8-11 June 2009, Vienna, Austria.

Belay D, Azage T and Hegde B P 2012 Smallholder Livestock Production System in Dandi District, Oromia Regional State, Central Ethiopia. Global Veterinaria 8 (5): 472-479, 2012.

Belay Z 2014 Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Growth and Reproductive Traits of Fogera X Holstein Friesian Crossbred Cattle at Metekel Ranch, Amhara Region, Ethiopia.MSc. Thesis, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.Pp 109.

BoA (Bureau of Agriculture) 1999 Amhara National Regional State: Agricultural research master plan. Volume III-part 7: Animal Production improvement research, technical report (final). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Chencha C, Zewdu W and Workneh A 2012 Reproduction performance and milk off-take of indigenous cattle of GamoGoffa Zone, Souther-Western Ethiopia. Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP); EJAP ISSN: 1607-3835 Volume 12, Number 1, 2012; pp 73-86.

DAGRIS 2007 Domestic Animal Genetic Resources Information System (DAGRIS). (eds. S. Kemp, Y. Mamo, B. Asrat and Tadele Dessie). International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.http://dagris.ilri.cgiar.org

De Vries A 2006 Determinants of the cost of days open in dairy cattle. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, 2006. www.sciquest.org.nz.

Demeke S, Neser F W C and Schoeman S J 2004 Estimates of genetic parameters for Boran, Friesian, and  crosses  of  Friesian  and  Jersey  with  the  Boran  cattle  in  the  tropical  highlands  of  Ethiopia: reproduction traits. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 121: 57-65.

Demissu H, Fekadu B, and Gemeda D 2013 Early Growth and Reproductive Performances of Horro Cattle and their F1 Jersey Crosses in and around Horro-Guduru Livestock Production and Research Center, Ethiopia. Sci. Technol. Arts Res. J., July-Sep 2013, 2(3): 134-141.

Derese T 2008 Present situation of urban and peri-urban milk production and quality of raw milk produced in West Shoa zone, Oromia region, Ethiopia. MSc thesis, HaramayaUniversiy, Harar, Ethiopia.Pp 101.

Dinka H 2012 Reproductive performance of crossbred dairy cows under smallholder condition in Ethiopia. International Journal of Livestock Production Vol. 3(3), pp. 25-28

Drucker A G, Bergeron E, Lemke U, Thuy L T and Valle Zarate A 2006 Identification and quantification of subsidies relevant to the production of local and imported pig breeds in Vietnam. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 38:305-322.

Enyew N, Brannang E, Kebede B and Rottmann O J 1998 Reproductive performance of dairy cattle at Asella livestock farm, Arsi, Ethiopia. I: Indigenous cows versus their F1 crosses. J. Anim. Breed. Genet.  115, 267-280.

Firdessa R, Tschopp R, Wubete A, Sombo M, Hailu E, Erenso G, Kiros T, Yamuah L, Vordermeier M, Hewinson R G, Young D, Gordon S V, Sahile M, Assefa A, Berg S 2012 High prevalence of Bovine Tuberculosis in dairy cattle in central Ethiopia: implications for the dairy industry and public health. PLoSOne, 2012; 7(12): e52851.

Gebeyehu G 1999 Reproductive and Productive Performances of Fresian-Boran Crossbred cattle at Cheffa State Farm, Wollo, Ethiopia.MSc thesis.Alemaya University, Harer, Ethiopia.Pp 75.

Gebeyehu G, Asmare A and Asseged B 2005 Reproductive performances of Fogera cattle and their Friesian crosses in Andassa ranch, Northwestern Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 17 (12) 2005.

Gebeyehu G, Azage T, Tezera M and Aklilu A 2004 Preliminary report on the distribution of Fogera cattle around Lake Tana, Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, ESAP. Proceedings of the 11th annual conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2004, 203-207.

Gebeyehu G, Kelay B and Abebe B 2007 Effect of parity, season and year onreproductive performance and herd life of Friesian cows at Stella private dairy farm, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 19 (7) 2007.

Gebeyehu G, Harpal S, Karl-Johan P and Nils L 2014 Heritability and correlation among first lactation traits in Holstein Friesian cows at Holeta Bull Dam Station, Ethiopia. Acadamicajournals; Vol.5(3),pp. 47-53, March, 2014.

Gebrekidan T, Zeleke M and Gangwar S K 2012 Reproductive and Productive Performance of Dairy Cattle in Central Zone of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. I.J.A.B.R., VOL. 2(1) 2012:58-63. 58-63pp.

Getinet M 2006 Fogera cattle breeding line/pedigree at Andassa Livestock Research Center.Andassa livestock research center; May 16, 2006 (working document).

Getinet M, Workneh A and Hegde B P 2009 Growth and reproductive performance of Ogaden cattle at Haramaya University, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Animal Production (EJAP). 9(1):13-38.

Giday Y 2001 Assessment of calf crop productivity and total herd life of Fogera cows at Andassa ranch, Northwestern Ethiopia. M.Sc. Thesis. Alemaya University, Alemya, Ethiopia.

Habib MA 2011 Analysis of Red Chittagong Cattle Genotype in Nucleus Breeding Herd.Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh.Pp. 158.

Habtamu A, Solomon A and Yoseph M 2012 Influence of non-genetic factors on growth traits of Horro (Zebu) and their crosses with Holstein Friesian and Jersey cattle. International Journal of Livestock Production Vol. 3(7), pp. 72-77, December 2012.

Habtamu L, Kelay B, and Desie S 2010 Study on the reproductive performance of Jersey cows at WolaitaSodo dairy farm, Southern Ethiopia. Ethiop. Vet. J., 2010, 14 (1), 53-70.

Hailemariam M and Kassa-Mersha H 1994 Genetic and environmental effects on age at first calving and calving interval of naturally bred Boran (zebu) cows in Ethiopia. Animal Production, 58: 329-334.

Hailemariam M and Mekonnen G 1996 Reproductive Performance of Zebu, Friesian and Friesian. Zebu crosses. Tropical Agriculture, 73: 142-147.

Haileyesus A 2006 Evaluation of artificial insemination service efficiency and Reproductive performance of F1 Friesian crosses in North Gondar zone, Ethiopia.MSc. Thesis, Alemaya University. Ethiopia.

Hailu D and Tadele M 2003 Influence of Dam Genotype, Age of Dam and Parity on Age at First Calving, Calving Interval and Birth Weight in Indigenous and Crossbred Cattle at Adami Tulu. Proceedings of the 11th annual conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP) held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, August 28-30, 2003. Pp.227-232

Kefelegn S, Ashenafi M, Kassahun M and Adey M 2013 Assessment of Reproductive and Productive performance of Dairy cattle breed in three districts of East Shoa Zone, Central Ethiopia. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP) held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, August 28-30, 2013, 271-278pp.

Kefena E, Zewdie W, Tadelle D and Aynalem H 2011 Genetic and environmental trends in the long-term dairy  cattle  genetic  improvement  programmes  in  the  central  tropical  highlands  of  Ethiopia. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/

Mekonen H 1987 Evaluation of growth and reproductive performance of Borana cattle and their crosses with Friesian at Abernossa, Ethiopia.MSc. Thesis, Alemaya University of Agriculture, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.

Mekonnen H and Goshu M 1987 Reproductive performance of Fogera cattle and their Fresian Cattle. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Science (EJAS).Ethiop. J. Agric. Sci.: Volume IX No 2 ISSN 0257-2605. Pp 95-114

Melaku M, Zeleke M, Getinet M and Mengistie T 2011a Pre-weaninggrowth performances of Fogera calves at Metekel cattle improvement and multiplication ranch, North West Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development.Volume 23, Article #182.

Melaku M, Zeleke M, Getinet M and Mengistie T 2011b Reproductive Performances of Fogera Cattle at Metekel Cattle Breeding and Multiplication Ranch, North West Ethiopia. J. Anim. Feed Res., 1(3): 99-106.

Melaku N 2003 Genetic Studies of Age at First Calving for Holstein-Friesians. Farm Animal Biodiversity in Ethiopia: Status and Prospects. Proceedings of the 11th annual conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP) held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, August 28-30, 2003. 223-226 pp.

MFCBCMR (Metekel Fogera cattle breed conservation and multiplication ranch) 2013 The status of Fogera cattle at Metekel ranch. A report presented at “annual workshop in Fogera cattle conservation in Amhara Region”; Andassa Livestock research Center, West Gojjam, Ethiopia.

Million T and Tadelle D 2003 Milk production performance of Zebu, Holstein Friesian and their crosses in Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development (15) 3 2003.

Million T, Tadelle D, Gifawesen T, Tamirate D and Yohanis G 2006 Study on Age at First Calving, Calving Interval and Breeding Efficiency of Bostaurus, Bosindicus and their Crosses in the Highlands of Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Animal Production 6(2): 1-16.

Mohammed A 2004 Estimates of genetic parameters of birth weight, age at first calving and milk production traits in Holstein Friesian dairy herds kept in three state farms. An MSc Thesis presented to School of Graduate studies of Alemaya University. Pp 89.

Mukasa-Mugerwa E 1989 A review of reproductive performance of female Bosindicus (Zebu) cattle. ILCA, Monograph No. 6. International Livestock Center for Africa, AddisAbaba, Ethiopia.

Niraj K, Alemayehu E, Berihu G and Endale B G 2014 Reproductive performance of indigenous and HF crossbred dairy cows in Gondar, Ethiopia. IOSR-JAVS, Volume 7, Issue 1 Ver. V (Feb. 2014), PP 56-61.

Nuraddis I, Ashebir A and Shiferaw M 2011 Assessment of reproductive performance of crossbred dairy cattle (Holstein Friesian X zebu) in Gondar town. Global Veterinaia 6(6): 561-566, 2011.

Oumer S, Berhanu B and Aynalem H 2013 On-farm phenotypic characterization of indigenous cattle types in Jimma zone, Southwestern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP); EJAP ISSN: 1607-3835 Volume 13, Number 1, 2013; pp 1-16.

Oyama K, Katsuta T, Anada K and Mukai F 2004 Genetic parameters for reproductive performance of breeding cows and carcass traits of fattening animals in Japanese Black (Wagyu). Animal Science 78, 195-201.

Rege J E O and Tawah L C 1999 The state of Africa cattle genetic resource II. Geographical distribution, characteristics and uses of present-day breeds and strains. International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.O. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

SAS (Statistical Analysis System) Software Version 9.00 2002 SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

Shiferaw Y, Tenhagen B A, Bekana M, and Kassa T 2003 Reproductive performance of cross breed dairy cows in different production systems in the central Highlands of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production35: 551.

Tesfaye M 2008 Characterization of cattle milk and meat production, processing and marketing system in Metema district. MSc Thesis, School of Graduate Studies, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.

Tewodros B 2008 Assessment of Productive and Reproductive Performance of Indigenous and Crossbred Cattle under Smallholder Management System in North Gondar, Amhara Region.MSc. Thesis; Mekele University, Ethiopia.Pp 136.

Wasike C B 2006 Genetic evaluation of growth and reproductive performance of the Kenya Boran cattle. MSc. Egerton University, Kenya. Pp 108.

Yifat D, Bahilibi W and Desie S 2012 Reproductive Performance of Boran Cows at Tatesa Cattle Breeding Center. Advan. Biol. Res., 6 (3): 101-105, 2012

Yitay A A, Maria W, Azage T and Werner Z 2009 Performance and limitation of two dairy production systems in the North western Ethiopian highlands. Trop Anim Health Prod (2009) 41:1143–1150.

Yohannes G, Zelalem Y, Gizachew B, Alemu G and Sendros D 2001 Milk yield and reproductive performance of Borana cows and growth rate of their calves under partial suckling method. In: Proceeding of the 9th National Conference of Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP). Aug 30-31, 2001. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. pp 367 - 370.

Yosef T 2006 Genetic and Non-Genetic analysis of fertility and production traits in Holetta and Ada’a Berga Dairy herds. MSc.Thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia. Pp 143.

Zewdu W, Wurzinger M, Tadele D and Sölkner J 2004 Potential of indigenous animal genetic resources as an adaptive mechanism on climate change: The case of Mahibere-Slassie composite cattle breed. Proceeding of Agricultural economics society of Ethiopia.


Received 5 November 2015; Accepted 1 December 2015; Published 2 January 2016

Go to top