Livestock Research for Rural Development 25 (10) 2013 Guide for preparation of papers LRRD Newsletter

Citation of this paper

Nutrient composition of forest based foliages consumed by Mithun (Bos frontalis) under Imphal district of Manipur

B Prakash, S S Rathore*, K Khate** and C Rajkhowa**

Project Directorate on Poultry, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030, Andhra Pradesh
drbhukyaprakash@gmail.com
* Directorate of Rapeseed-Mustard Research, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Sewar, Bharatpur -321303, Rajasthan
** National Research Centre on Mithun, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Jharnapani, Medziphema -797106, Nagaland

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to determine the micronutrient content in important forest based foliages that are available in some parts of Imphal districts of Manipur. The foliage species were selected because they are abundantly available, and highly preferred by mithun in its natural habitat, and because farmers strongly believe that these foliage species are highly nutritious. The collected samples were subjected for estimation of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), crude fibre (CF), ash and condensed tannins (CT). The foliages were also estimated for some of the macro and micro minerals using standard procedures.

The DM, CP, EE, CF, ash and CT ranged from 11.0 to 42.3, 9.20 to 26.3, 0.7 to 4.0, 12.1 to 33.8, 3.60 to 17.6 and 0.30 to 12.0%, respectively. The macro mineral i.e. Ca, P, Mg, Na and K content ranged from 1.47 to 3.10, 0.11 to 0.34, 0.07 to 0.95, 0.01 to 0.08 and 0.95 to 2.44%, respectively. Similarly, the micro mineral i.e. Zn, Fe and Cu content ranged from 37.0 to 92.0, 146 to 302 and 5.0 to 19.0 mg/kg, respectively. Therefore, it has been concluded that the nutrient contents were adequate in most of the foliages. However, the Na was deficient in majority of the foliages and may explain observed salt seeking behavior of Mithun reared under free grazing systems.

Key words: ecosystems, foliages, India, nutrient composition


Introduction

Mithun is a unique free-range domesticated bovine found mainly in the subtropical rain forest of Northeastern Hilly Region (NEHR) of India ) (Photo 1). This species is also found in many pockets of Southeast Asia (Simoons 1984). Mithun is an important component of the cultural and socio-economical life of its rearers, and thrives on natural vegetation and tree fodders as its major feed resources (Prakash et al 2008). In general, farmers do not provide any feed supplements except common salt (Photo 2).

Photo 1. Mithun cattle in the study area Photo 2. In general, farmers do not provide any feed supplements except common salt

The NEHR of India is mega biodiversity region of the world and harbors great floral diversity (Myers et al 2000). The evergreen forest of NEHR is a potential source of tree fodders throughout the year. Despite their potential as feeds, meager information is available on their nutrient composition. However, the previous report indicates that some of the tree foliages have high feeding value (Prakash et al 2009). Further, as the topography of the mithun habitat is undulating, leaching of minerals is a common phenomenon (Kleinman et al 1996) and soils are prone to mineral deficiencies, which could affect vegetation (Prasad et al 1986). This may be the reason why mithuns reared under free grazing conditions exhibit salt licking behavior. Therefore, it is imperative to study the nutrient status of the important browse species in order to develop a suitable feeding strategy for mithun.

The objective was to determine the nutrient composition and to relate the analysed nutrient values to those recommended by the National Research Council (1978) and summarized by McDowell (1997). The experimental foliage species were selected because they are abundantly available and highly preferred by mithun in its natural habitat. Further, the farmers strongly believe that these foliage species are highly nutritious.


Materials and methods

Sample collection

The samples of the selected foliage species were collected from various packets of Imphal district of Manipur. Approximately 1 kg of the foliage was harvested from each species as a single sample of leaves harvested from a single tree. The samples were mixed thoroughly and a representative sample of 200 g was finally collected, dried and stored for further laboratory analysis. All samples were collected within 25 days to minimize effects of sampling time on nutrient composition.

Chemical analysis

Dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) (N × 6.25), ether extract (EE), crude fibre (CF) and ash were determined  according to AOAC (1980). Condensed tannin (CT) was analysed according to Porter et al (1986), wherein 200 mg of ground sample was placed in a 50 ml conical flask and mixed thoroughly with 20 ml of diethyl ether containing 10 g/l acetic acid and kept for 5 min. Diethyl ether was removed by decantation and the residue dried at 30º C for 30 min. Dried residue was mixed with 10 ml aqueous acetone and incubated in an orbital shaker (30º C, 130 rpm) for 2 h. Following incubation, the content was centrifuged (20 min at 5000 × g) at 4º C and the supernatant was collected for analysis. For CT fractionation, the extract was treated with butanol–HCl in the presence of ferric ammonium sulphate and expressed as leucocyanidin equivalent (A550 nm × 782.6/wt. of sample DM; A 550 nm is the absorbance at 550 nm assuming that the effective E1%,1cm, 550 nm of leucocyanidin is 460).

For mineral estimation, 1 g of dried sample was ignited in a muffle furnace at 550º C for 3 h. The ash was dissolved in hydrochloric acid (337 g/l) and filtered through filter paper (Whatman ® Grade no. 1), and the final volume was made to 250 ml with Milli-Q water (Millipore Corporation, Bedford, MA, USA). All minerals (i.e., Ca, P, Mg, Na, K, Cu, Fe, Mn Zn) were estimated using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS; Thermo Electron Corp., Cambridge, UK) according to methods suggested by the manufacturer. A specific lamp was used for each mineral and the AAS was calibrated with various concentrations of mineral standards. The standards and samples were positioned and injected using the furnace auto-sampler (GFS 97; Thermo Electron Corp.). The concentration of each element was retrieved using the Solaar software (Version 10.11; Thermo Electron Corp.). To determine the content of Ca and Mg, processed samples were further diluted with 87 g/l lanthanum chloride to mask interferences of Al, Be, P, Si, Ti, V and Zn.


Results and discussion

Most of the foliages are perennial and deciduous or evergreen those are highly preferred by mithun in their natural habitat. The traditional forest based foliages have a wide variation in DM, CP, EE, CF, ash and CT content occurred among the foliages (Table 1). However, nutrient compositions of the foliages are constant with previous reports of chemical composition of foliages (Prakash et al 2009) from Nagaland. Most of the foliages contained acceptable levels of CT (i.e., <5% on DM [Waghorn et al 1990]), which reduces the excess ruminal ammonia production and increases the protein availability at the lower gastro-intestinal tract. This will leads to increase the production potential in the animals. Further, most of the evaluated foliage have sufficient CP (i.e., >14%, Subba 1999) to support growth and maintenance of mithun under its natural habitat.

Table  1. Local name and chemical composition* (% DM basis) of different foliages of Manipur

Local Name

Scientific Name

Description

¥ DM

CP

EE

CF

Ash

CT

Nake

Calicarpa arborea

Tree

27.3

16.9

3.3

21.7

5.7

2.5

Lingshi

Sarcochlamys pulcherrima

Tree

26.2

14.6

2.6

23.7

11.6

6.1

Shontakhao

-

Tree

42.3

13.6

1.6

12.1

9.4

2.2

Nehei

Tithonia rotundifolia

Shrub

11.0

15.0

1.5

14.2

12.9

0.8

Anshunglung Lhempa

Elastostema spp

Shrub

14.7

11.2

1.5

22.1

11.7

1.7

Vaopa

Bauhinia hookeri

Tree

27.2

16.5

1.2

24.8

9.3

7.8

Shilgil

Calicarpa macrophylla

Tree

32.7

19.5

2.8

25.8

4.9

6.0

Chelmanchak

Urena lobata

Shrub

23.5

14.2

1.3

17.5

12.8

2.2

Theiba

Ficus spp

Tree

17.9

15.6

1.7

16.0

12.4

1.4

Boapha

Gentiana spp

Tree

30.8

15.5

2.6

15.2

16.4

4.9

Theichang

Ficus incurva

Tree

30.0

13.3

1.4

19.8

9.4

2.4

Shakhikeng

Solanum spp

Shrub

12.3

23.8

0.8

15.1

8.0

5.6

Lhakhai

Urtica dioica

Shrub

14.7

26.3

2.1

28.4

15.5

7.6

Thom

Leucosceptrum canum

Tree

21.4

18.7

3.1

18.6

7.4

4.8

-

Sarcochlamys spp

Tree

29.2

12.6

0.7

26.0

6.5

0.3

Antheichan

Ficus silhetensis

Tree

23.5

17.1

2.1

21.3

7.9

2.2

Teithing

-

Tree

17.6

23.3

2.0

20.6

10.2

1.5

Chepi

Sauriara panduana

Tree

25.4

16.8

1.7

17.2

17.6

1.9

Mongche

Ficus spp

Tree

35.0

15.0

1.5

34.7

3.6

10

Longlao

Neyraudia reynaudiana

Grass

34.3

9.2

1.6

33.8

5.8

12

Kaichin

Rubus spp

Shrub

24.8

17.0

1.8

26.3

9.1

7.0

Gongngal

Thysalona agrostis

Grass

32.5

14.8

2.2

27.6

7.4

7.5

Anthudul

Herpetospermum spp

Creeper

11.4

23.0

2.3

24.5

3.5

4.9

Khaogui

Vitex spp

Shrub

16.0

12.9

2.3

29.4

12.1

5.8

Belkan

Verbena spp

Tree

27.7

17.7

4.0

15.1

12.0

4.9

Chinge

-

Tree

26.5

16.3

2.1

23.6

13.0

7.1

Theijon

Ficus hirta

Tree

19.1

18.4

3.0

16.7

12.8

7.8

Cmuntheh

-

Grass

25.9

12.1

2.6

27.9

8.1

3.6

Phaileng

Imperata cylindrica

Grass

31.7

10.0

1.0

32.0

6.4

1.9

Sheijeplhem

Herpetospermum spp

Creeper

17.1

24.2

3.9

18.9

5.8

5.3

Uilivun

Passiflora foetida linn

Shrub

19.7

12.9

3.0

26.5

10.1

2.6

Ngalbu

Cynodon dactylon

Grass

27.4

12.9

2.8

31.6

12.6

4.5

Louthul

Allium spp

Herb

17.5

22.1

2.4

21.9

13.0

5.2

DM, dry matter (¥ g/100 g fresh matter); CP, crude protein; EE, ether extract; CF crude fibre;
*Each value represents assays of three samples.

Majority of the foliages contained high Ca, Mg, K, Fe, Mn and Zn relative to requirements (Table 2).

Table 2. Variation in macro and micro mineral concentration in different foliages

 

Micro, (mg/kg)

Macro, (%)

Zn

Fe

Cu

Ca

P

Mg

Na

K

Callicarpa arborea

92

267

18

2.10

0.11

0.26

0.01

2.10

Sarcochlamys pulcherrima

83

219

7

2.00

0.30

0.14

0.03

2.16

#Shontakhao

58

181

6

1.77

0.21

0.57

0.02

1.13

Tithonia rotundifolia

63

280

12

1.95

0.11

0.25

0.04

1.75

Elastostema spp

59

208

5

3.10

0.17

0.63

0.07

1.70

Bauhinia hookeri

85

168

9

2.65

0.28

0.11

0.06

2.02

Callicarpa macrophylla

82

302

7

2.50

0.30

0.58

0.02

2.01

Urena lobata

78

268

11

2.10

0.24

0.95

0.05

2.40

Ficus spp

77

180

13

1.65

0.24

0.21

0.01

1.81

Gentiana spp

77

195

19

1.56

0.11

0.07

0.05

1.61

Ficus incurva

66

168

7

2.10

0.12

0.24

0.03

1.40

Solanum spp

53

175

8

2.35

0.11

0.61

0.01

1.75

Urtica dioica

87

291

7

2.65

0.10

0.11

0.02

1.31

Leucosceptrum canum

63

221

6

2.20

0.23

0.17

0.04

1.25

Sarcochlamys spp

66

241

12

3.10

0.20

0.14

0.07

1.50

Ficus silhetensis

76

265

14

3.10

0.19

0.24

0.02

2.44

#Teithing

61

188

11

1.63

0.20

0.22

0.01

1.67

Sauriara panduana

85

203

9

2.14

0.13

0.17

0.03

2.15

Ficus spp

57

146

12

2.20

0.21

0.19

0.04

1.65

Neyraudia reynaudiana

37

225

9

2.10

0.33

0.27

0.01

2.14

Rubus spp

70

265

13

2.00

0.20

0.34

0.02

1.35

Thysanolaena agrostis

85

156

10

2.30

0.12

0.11

0.03

2.10

Herpetospermum spp

65

198

8

2.14

0.20

0.10

0.07

1.35

Vitex spp

75

253

10

2.50

0.30

0.71

0.05

2.01

Verbena spp

86

255

5

1.65

0.34

0.09

0.08

1.65

#Chinge

71

177

12

1.47

0.28

0.12

0.08

1.24

Ficus hirta

74

296

9

1.90

0.36

0.17

0.01

2.14

#Cmuntheh

81

221

11

1.71

0.20

0.24

0.05

1.99

Imperata cylindrica

76

210

6

2.01

0.13

0.31

0.04

1.05

Herpetospermum spp

65

177

8

2.50

0.31

0.42

0.03

1.52

Passiflora foetida linn

57

265

9

2.35

0.11

0.24

0.01

1.68

Cynodon dactylon

98

156

10

1.95

0.30

0.31

0.01

1.74

Allium spp

73

168

7

2.65

0.21

0.65

0.04

0.95

Normal requirement range¥

Minimum

20

30

7

0.19

0.12

0.01

0.06

0.5

Maximum

40

50

11

0.82

0.48

0.25

0.18

1.0

#Local names (foliages were not identified taxonomically)
¥Recommended range of mineral elements (for all classes of ruminants) as suggested by the National Research Council and summarized by McDowell (1997).

Therefore, deficiencies of these minerals are unlikely in mithun those are maintained exclusively on these foliages. It is also a rare chance that toxic effects of Fe would occur as ruminants tolerate comparatively high levels of Fe (>1000 ppm), if consumed in natural foliages (NRC 1978). However, it has been reported that the high levels of Fe may interfere with Cu absorption and metabolism (Youssef et al 1999). The content of P and Cu was within the required range for ruminants (McDowell 1997). The Na content varied widely and, in all the foliages, it was deficient compared to the required range. It is well known in the NEHR that Mithun shows salt-hunger behavior extensively under free-grazing condition (Simoons 1984), which might be due to the deficiency of Na in the foliages as it has been recorded in the present study. The higher Ca and Mg contents in the foliages might be due to relatively higher uptake of these elements from coarse textured soils with low cation exchange ability (Sillanpaa 1982). These type of the soils generally found in the NEHR of India. The Ca:P ratio was much wider in all foliages, compared to those recommended for ruminants (McDowell 1997), which may create problem with vitamin D metabolism (ARC 1984). However, it can be overcome by supplementing with the foliages with higher P that are recorded in the present study and Tithonia diversifolia like foliages, which contain higher P (Olabode et al 2007).


Conclusions


Acknowledgement

Authors are highly thankful to the Indian Council of Agricultural Research for granting the A.P. Cess Fund Scheme (F. No. 8 (29) 2004-ASR-II. Dated 03.05.2005) to conduct the study and the villagers of Waiphei (Leimakhong) surrounding areas of Imphal district of Manipur for helping in documentation of the work.


References

AOAC 1980 Official Methods of Analysis, 13th ed. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA, pp. 125-142.

ARC 1984 The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Technical Review by an Agricultural research Council working party. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough, UK.

Kleinman P J A, Bryant R B and Pimentel D 1996 Assessing ecological sustainability of slash-and-burn agriculture through soil fertility indicators. Agronomy Journal 88, 122-127.

McDowell L R 1997 Minerals for grazing ruminants in tropical regions. University of Florida, Institute for Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.

Myers N R A, Mittermeier C G, Mittermeier G A B and Da Fonseca Kent J 2000 Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853-858.

NRC 1978 Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, vol. 3., 5th ed. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.

Olabode O S, Ogunyemi Sola, Akanbi WB, Adesina G O and Babajide P A 2007 Evaluation of Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A Gray for Soil Improvement. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 3, 503-507.

Porter L J, Hrstich L N and Chang B G 1986 The conversion of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyaniding and delphinidin. Phytochemistry 25, 223-230.

Prakash B, Dhali A, Mech A, Khate K, Moaakum H and Rajkhowa C 2008 Effect of feeding forest foliages, rice straw and concentrate-based total mixed ration on nutrient utilization and growth in mithun (Bos frontalis ). Livestock Science 117, 263-269.

Prakash B, Dhali A, Rathore S S, Das K C, Walling I, Vupru K, Mech A, Baruah K K and Rajkhowa C 2009 Chemical composition and nutritional evaluation of various foliages consumed by mithun (Bos frontalis). Animal Feed Science and Technology 150, 223-229.

Prasad R N, Singh A and Verma A 1986 Problems of hill lands and their management in Northeastern hill region of India. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation 14, 66-72.

Reed JD, Soller H and Woodward A 1990 Fodder tree and straw diets for sheep: intake, growth, digestibility and the effects of phenolics on nitrogen utilization. Animal Feed Science and Technology 30, 39-50.

Sillanpaa M 1982 Micronutrients and Nutrient Status of Soils: A Global Study. FAO Soils Bulletin No, 48 Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

Simoons F J 1984 Gayal or Mithun. In: Mason (Ed.), Evolution of Domesticated Animals. Longman, London, UK, 34.

Subba D B 1999 Tree fodders and browse plants as potential nutrient suppliers for ruminants. In: Neopane, S.P., Khanal, R.C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd National Workshop on Livestock and Fisheries Research. Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Waghorn G C, Jones W T, Shelton I D and McNabb W C 1990 Condensed tannins and the nutritive value of herbage, Proceedings  New Zealand Grassland Association 51, 171-176.

Waghorn G L, Ulyan M J, John A and Fisher M T 1987 The effect of condensed tannins on site of digestion of amino acids and other nutrients in sheep fed on Lotus corniculatus L. British Journal of Nutrition 57, 115-126.

Youssef F G, McDowell L R and Brathwaite R A I 1999 The status of certain trace mineral and sulfur of some tropical grasses in Trinidad. Tropical Agriculture 76, 57-62.


Received 30 August 2013; Accepted 23 September 2013; Published 1 October 2013

Go to top