Livestock Research for Rural Development 21 (12) 2009 Guide for preparation of papers LRRD News

Citation of this paper

Effects of growth stage on chemical composition, organic matter digestibility, gross energy and fatty acid content of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)

P G Peiretti

Institute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council, Grugliasco, Turin, Italy
piergiorgio.peiretti@ispa.cnr.it

Abstract

Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), which is grown as a high-quality forage crop for dairy cattle and dairy sheep in Mediterranean conditions, has been studied to determine the chemical composition, in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD), gross energy (GE) and fatty acid (FA) profile of the plant during growth.

 

Herbage samples were collected five times at progressive morphological stages from the late vegetative to the early flower stage. The dry matter, organic matter, fibrous fractions and GE content increased with increasing growth stage, while the ash, crude protein and IVOMD decreased during growth.  Linoleic and α-linolenic acid were the two main FAs in the safflower plant during the growth cycle and they ranged from 158 to 188 g/kg  and 521 to 586 g/kg  of the total FA, respectively.

 

The quality and IVOMD of safflower, like other forages, depends on the development of the plant and decreases with increased maturity. A forage with a good nutritive value can be obtained by harvesting safflower at the early flowering stage. 

Key words: Carthamus tinctorius, crude protein, gross energy, lipid, morphological stage


Introduction

Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) is an annual oil-seed crop that originated in the eastern Mediterranean area (Knowles 1976). It has earned a reputation as a drought-resistant plant, and for this reason it has been cultivated successfully in semiarid regions (Quiroga et al 2001; Yau 2007).

 

Safflower provides four principle products: oil, meal, seed, and fodder (Knowles 1989). The oil is used by both food producers and in industry. The meal (about 24% protein), which is relatively low in energy and high in fibre when the hulls are included. The  decorticated meal (about 40% protein), with most of hulls removed and a reduced fibre content, can be used as a protein supplement for low protein forages in livestock diets or in poultry backgrounding diets. Safflower seed can be used as a protein and energy supplement for beef cattle (Bottger et al 2002; Scholljegerdes et al 2004; Bolte et al 2002) and sheep (Kott et al 2003). Prepartum supplementation with safflower seeds high in either linoleate or oleate has increased the subsequent conception rates in primiparous beef cows (Lammoglia et al 1997).

 

Safflower is a high-quality forage crop that can be grown in arid and semiarid regions with limited water resources (Bar-Tal et al 2008; Leshem et al 2000) and can also be grown successfully on poorly fertile soil and in areas with relatively low temperatures (Koutroubas  and Papadoska 2005). Safflower has the potential of lengthening the duration of lush green pastures under arid Mediterranean conditions and cattle and sheep can graze succulent safflower regrowth and stubble fields after the harvest. Safflower pastures are adequate for growing ruminants which have moderate requirements for pasture quality (Landau et al 2005). Grazed safflower has been shown to sustain satisfactory growth rates in Australian steers (French et al 1988). Sheep have been able to utilise safflower forage and thorough chewing of spines likely prevents mouth ulceration. Ewes selectively consume the most nutrient-dense parts of the forage (Stanford et al 2001). A safflower monoculture at the pre-blooming stage can be used safely as the only feed for grazing sheep (Landau et al 2004) and the intake of safflower green fodder, cut to a 30 cm height, has exceeded maintenance requirements for energy and protein in sheep (Vonghia et al 1992). Spineless safflower cultivars, which could be used as fodder with dry-matter (DM) yields of up to 22 t/ha, and a high DM digestibility for safflower hay fed to heifers, have been introduced (Leshem et al 2001). Research conducted in Montana and Alberta indicates that safflower crops damaged by frost may be cut for hay. The thorny nature of the plant naturally causes concern, but in feeding trials conducted with ewes in Alberta, no aversion to the forage was noted and intakes were similar to a conventional alfalfa hay-based diet. It has also been reported to improve fertility in Canadian ewes, in comparison to alfalfa-grass hay (Stanford et al 2001). Safflower hay, given ad libitum, has successfully been used as the only food for late-pregnant dairy cows (Landau et al 2004).

 

Safflower cropped at the budding stage can be ensiled successfully (Weinberg et al 2002; Weinberg et al 2006) and it can substitute cereal silage in the diet of high-yielding dairy cows, without affecting dairy performance (Landau et al 2004).

 

As safflower has only recently been re-discovered as a fodder crop, there are no data available on its fatty acid (FA) profile and there is little information available regarding its nutritive value during the growth cycle or the optimum time for harvesting. The purpose of the present work was to study the effects of growth stage on the chemical composition, in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD), gross energy (GE) and FA content of safflower.

 

Materials and methods 

Plant material and environmental conditions

 

The study was conducted in the Western Po Valley near Cuneo, Italy (latitude 44N, longitude 7E). The stands were seeded on 20 May 2006, and no irrigations or fertilisers were applied after sowing. Herbage samples were collected with edging shears (0.1 m cutting width) at five progressive morphological stages from the late vegetative to the early flowering stage, on subplots of 2 m2 randomly located in 3 x 10 m2 plots with three replicates cut to a 1 to 2 cm stubble height. The sampling time ranged from June to July 2006. Sampling was not performed on rainy days and was carried out in the morning, only after the disappearance of dew.

 

Chemical analysis

 

Whole plant samples were immediately dried in a forced-draft oven to constant weight at 65C to determine the dry matter (DM) content and were then air equilibrated, ground in a Cyclotec mill (Tecator, Herndon, VA, USA) to pass a 1 mm screen, and stored for later analyses. The proximate composition of the dried samples was determined according to the AOAC method (AOAC 1990). The samples were analysed to determine the total N content, ash by ignition to 550C, and ether extract (EE) using the Soxhlet method. Neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and acid detergent fibre (ADF) were determined as described by Van Soest et al (1991). The GE was determined using an adiabatic calorimeter bomb (IKA C7000, Staufen, Germany), while the IVOMD was determined according to the two-stage rumen fluid technique (Tilley and Terry 1963).

 

Fatty acid analyses

 

Fresh samples of the whole plants were immediately frozen, subsequently freeze-dried and ground to pass a 1 mm screen. Lipid extraction was performed on freeze-dried samples according to Hara and Radin (1978), while the transesterification of the FAs was carried out according to Christie (1982), with the modifications described by Chouinard et al (1999). The FA methyl esters were then determined by gas chromatography according to Peiretti and Meineri (2008).

 

Statistical analysis

 

The variability in FA and the herbage chemical composition of the samples  harvested at five stages of maturity were analysed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the Statistical Package for Social Science (v 11.5, SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) to test the effect of the growth stage. When the values of F were significant (i.e., P<0.05), the Duncan range test (Duncan 1955) was used to detect differences among means.

 

Results and discussion 

Crop quality

 

The herbage quality and GE at the five different stages of development are reported in Table 1.


Table 1.  Chemical composition (g/kg DM) and gross energy (GE) of Carthamus tinctorius at five morphological stages

Stage and

Days after sowing

Late vegetative,

37

Stem extension,

43

Initial branching,

50

Full branching,

57

Early Flowering,

63

S.E.M.

DM, g/kg FM

83a

108b

125c

145d

157d

7.2

OM

829a

859b

866b

871b

893c

5.8

Ash

171a

141b

134b

129b

107c

5.8

Crude protein

272a

214b

147c

125cd

124d

15.7

Ether extract

29a

24bc

22c

26ab

23bc

0.9

NDF

313a

336a

376b

469c

491c

19.2

ADF

172a

217b

279c

374d

415e

24.7

GE, MJ/kg  DM

16.2a

16.5ab

16.5ab

16.9b

17.8c

2.49

Within a row, values with different letters differ (P<0.05)


The DM content was very low throughout all the studied stages and increased with advancing morphological stage from 83 g/kg fresh matter (FM), for the late vegetative stage, to 157 g/kg FM for the early flowering stage. In Italy, similar trends have also been observed in safflower cultivated for hay and ensiling purposes, where the DM content increased from 123, at the bud initiation stage, to 520 g/kg FM at the seed filling stage (Corleto et al 2005). In Sardinia (Italy), Landau et al (2005) found that safflower DM content increased from 110 to 220 g/kg FM during the first spring growth cycle, while in Israel, safflower DM content remained steady at less than 400 g/kg FM throughout the growth cycle. 

 

The low DM content of safflower before the flowering stage, found in the present research, prolongs the wilting period and this could have a negative effect on the drying speed during wilting for ensiling purposes. Wilting the safflower forage for one or more days is very effective at the early stage of harvesting, as this practice greatly increases DM, and, at the same time, reduces the intensive fermentation and proteolysis processes of the silage. If harvesting is performed at the flowering stage, wilting is not necessary (Corleto et al 2008).

 

The CP and ash contents decreased, while OM, NDF, and ADF contents increased with time as the plant advanced to flowering. A similar trend has been observed in safflower harvested from bud initiation to the seed filling stage in Southern Italy by Corleto et al (2005), who showed that the decrease in CP content and the increase in fibrous components were related to a decrease in the leaf portion of the biomass, which has a higher CP concentration, and that an increased proportion of stems is related to the advance in maturity. As maturity stage increased, there was an increase in the DM content, whereas the safflower forage quality declined with time; this indicates that plants cut at an early stage of growth yield less forage, but have a higher concentration of CP and lower cell wall constituents, which result in a high nutritive value of the herbage. As forage advances in maturity, the quality change results in a decrease in the nutritive value of the herbage (Corleto et al 2005). As far as the CP content is concerned, in the present research, it decreased from 272 to 124 g/kg DM during the growth cycle. However, the average daily decline in CP content with increasing stage was higher than in the South Italian study (5.5 g/kg DM/day vs. 2.2 g/kg DM/day) (Corleto et al 2005). In Israel, the CP safflower content declined from 140 to approximately 110 g/kg DM, while in Sardinia the CP content in the DM of ingested safflower decreased from 190 to approximately 130 g/kg DM (Landau et al 2005). The safflower hay used by Landau et al (2004) was harvested at the late budding stage. It therefore had a higher CP content than the full-bloom hay used by Stanford et al (2001) (134 and 97 g/kg DM, respectively). Rahamatalla et al (1998) found that the CP content of the safflower seed increased rapidly with time and there were considerable variations in CP in the studied cultivars. These variations may have been due to the differences in the level of crude fibre in the seed which decreases the CP content of the seed and meal (Peiretti and Gai 2009); the decrease in CP content during the latter stage of development could also be due to the seed utilized protein for growth and development, as indicated by a rapid increase in seed volume with time (Rahamatalla et al 1998).

 

In the present research NDF and ADF increased from 313 to 491 g/kg DM and from 172 to 415 g/kg DM, respectively. The increase in fibrous fractions with increased stage of maturity is due to the progressive translocation of the soluble cell contents from the leaves and stems to the seeds. Landau et al (2005)  found that NDF ranged from 410 and 490 g/kg DM in safflower cultivated in Israel, while grazing safflower in Sardinia, the NDF content of safflower DM ingested by sheep was in a range of 270 and 370 g/kg DM. During a research carried out in Southern Italy, to evaluate the evolution of biomass and safflower quality from bud initiation to seed filling stage, the NDF and ADF content varied from 295 to 585 g/kg DM and from 193 to 403 g/kg DM, respectively (Corleto et al 2005).

 

The EE content at the late vegetative and full branching stages was higher than in the other stages. These variations are probably due to to the progressive translocation of the lipid cell contents from the leaves and stems to the seeds. In the safflower seed, the oil content reached its maximum and then slightly decreased. This may be due to the stabilization in oil content after completion of seed maturation which occurs 30 days after flowering (Rahamatalla et al 1998).

 

The GE content increased slowly with increasing growth stage and was highest in the last analyzed stage; this difference was primarily due to variations in the ash content, which was at its lowest in the early flowering stage. Similar trends have been observed in other oilseed plants, such as chia (Peiretti and Gai 2009), false flax (Peiretti and Meineri 2006) and evening primrose (Peiretti et al 2004).

 

In vitro organic matter digestibility

 

As the safflower advanced in maturity, the quality change resulted in a decrease in nutritive value of the herbage and a decrease in the IVOMD of 805 to 588 g/kg OM with a mean decrease of 3.3 g/kg OM/day (Figure 1).



Figure 1.   In vitro OM digestibility (IVOMD, -9.5 day + 1178.0; r2= 0.91; S.E. 16.0) during the growth cycle of Carthamus tinctorius


Forage crops are usually harvested to obtain an optimal compromise between yield and nutritional value. Leshem et al (2000) studied the effects of three sowing dates (November, December and the beginning of February) on DM yield and quality of safflower for forage which was harvested simultaneously at the end of April. The DM yields were 22, 15 and 8 t/ha, the DM digestibilities were 489, 521 and 655 and the CP concentrations were 100, 114 and 146 g/kg DM, respectively. Thus, younger plants resulted in a lower DM yield, but a higher nutritional value.

 

In southern Italy, safflower utilized as fodder crop has shown a similar daily DM intake and digestibility values to those of a vetch–oat mixture when it was offered to rams and its GE content was around 18.0 MJ/kg DM (Vonghia et al 1992). Landau et al (2004) measured the digestibility of a safflower hay product for pregnant dry cows when it was fed as the only feed. The in vivo digestibility of the DM from the safflower hay was 723 g/kg, while the in vitro DM digestibilities (IVDMD) of the ingested hay, leaves, stems, and orts were 646, 729, 546, and 505 g/kg, respectively. In Israel, the in vitro DM digestibility of the safflower plant remained remarkably steady between 650 and 660 g/kg; while grazing safflower, when the sheep consumed only leaves and buds and chose not to eat the coarse stems, the in vitro DM digestibility decreased from 790 to 720 g/kg during the spring growth cycle (Landau et al 2005).

 

Fatty acid profile

 

The differences in the FA profiles over the five morphological stages are reported in Table 2.


Table 2.  Fatty acid composition (g/kg  of total FA) of Carthamus tinctorius at five morphological stages

Stage and

Days after sowing

Late vegetative

37

Stem extension

43

Initial branching

50

Full branching

57

Early flowering

63

S.E.M.

 

C16

101b

90a

104bc

108cd

111d

2.1

C18

10b

8a

9a

10c

11d

0.3

C18:1 n-9

17a

15bc

14cd

16ab

13d

0.5

C18:1 n-7

0.4a

2.1ab

2.7ab

6.4c

4.0bc

0.7

C18:2 n-6

175a

158b

186a

188a

182a

3.4

C18:3 n-3

563ab

586a

552bc

531cd

521d

6.8

Others

134a

140a

132a

140a

158b

2.8

Within a row, values with different letters differ (P<0.05)


α-Linolenic acid (ALA, 18:3 n-3) was the dominant FA in the safflower during the growth cycle and ranged from 521 to 586 g/kg of the total FA. Linoleic (LA, 18:2 n-6) and palmitic (PA, 16:0) acids were the next most abundant FAs and they ranged  from 158 to 188 g/kg of the total FA and from 90 to 111 g/kg of the total FA, respectively. The concentrations of ALA decreased by 11% while the concentrations of PA increased by 19% between stem extension and early flowering. The remaining FAs were present in all the safflower stages with a variable trend.

 

The FA profile in the plant during growth differs from the oil in the seed. Standard safflower oil contains about 6–8% PA, 2–3% stearic acid (SA, 18:0), 16–20% oleic acid (OA, 18:1 n-9), and 71–75% LA (Velasco and Fernandez-Martinez 2001), but safflower is one of the best examples of plant that shows variability in the FA composition of seed oil (Knowles 1989). Gecgel et al (2007) showed that the oil content and the four major FAs in the safflower seeds were affected by sowing and harvest dates and that the moisture content declined 15 days from the flowering period to maturity, while the oil content increased. In the safflower seed, the saturated fraction mainly included PA and SA, and although the levels of PA regularly decreased during seed development, the levels of SA showed fluctuations (Gecgel et al 2007). Hamrouni et al (2004) demonstrated that rapid decreases in PA were accompanied by slight decreases in SA at the end of ripeness. Ladd and Knowles (1970) reported that their safflower varieties, with high levels of SA, contained lower levels in PA.

 

As far as the unsaturated fraction is concerned, an inverse relationship emerged between the development of the OA and LA in the seeds. The OA content increased in the high oleic variety, and the LA content increased in the high linoleic variety during seed development. Furthermore, changes in the composition of the FAs, especially the OA and LA, regarding the sowing date, were largely attributed to seasonal weather differences, particularly moisture and temperature, during the growing season (Ladd and Knowles 1970; Nagaraj and Reddy  1997).  Browse and Slack (1983) have reported the existence of an inhibitory effect of high temperature on desaturases in safflower seeds. The involved mechanism appears to be the direct effect of temperature on the activity of desaturase enzymes which convert OA to LA, and on the solubility of oxygen, which seems to play a regulatory function in that activity (Harris and James 1969). The enzymes that convert OA to LA are inactivated at a high temperature. Under low temperatures, the LA content increases, while under high temperatures the OA content increases.

 

During the growth cycle, ALA was the dominant FA in the whole safflower plant, while, during the process of seed formation and ripening, LA predominated in every lipid class of the seed and the ALA content was present in less than 3 g/kg of the total FA of the seed (Gecgel et al 2007), decreased with increasing maturation and was absent in fully mature safflower seeds (Nagaraj and Reddy 1997; Sims et al 1961). Hill and Knowles (1968) have shown that ALA is not found after 10 days of flowering in any studied variety, while McKillican and Sims (1963) have reported that low levels of this FA are contained in their safflower varieties as late as 30 days after flowering.

 

Conclusions 

References 

AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) 1990 Official Method of Analysis. 15th edition. Washington, DC, USA

 

Bar-Tal A, Landau S, Li-xin Z, Markovitz T, Keinan M, Dvash L, Brener S and Weinberg Z G 2008 Fodder quality of safflower across an irrigation gradient and with varied nitrogen rates. Agronomy Journal 100: 1499-1505

 

Bolte M R, Hess B W, Means W J, Moss G E and Rule D C 2002 Feeding lambs high-oleate or high-linoleate safflower seeds differentially influences carcass fatty acid composition. Journal of Animal Science 80: 609-616 http://jas.fass.org/cgi/reprint/80/3/609.pdf?ck=nck

 

Bottger J D, Hess B W, Alexander B M, Hixon D L, Woodard L F, Funston R N, Hallford D M and Moss G E 2002 Effects of supplementation with high linoleic or oleic cracked safflower seeds on postpartum reproduction and calf performance of primiparous beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 80: 2023-2030 http://jas.fass.org/cgi/reprint/80/8/2023

 

Browse J and Slack C R 1983 The effects of temperature and oxygen on the rates of fatty acid synthesis and oleate desaturation in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) seed. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 753: 145-152

 

Chouinard P Y, Corneau L, Sb A and Bauman D E 1999 Milk yield and composition during abomasal infusion of conjugated linoleic acids in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 2737-2745 http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/82/12/2737.pdf

 

Christie W W 1982 A simple procedure for rapid transmethylation of glycerolipids and cholesteryl esters. Journal of Lipid Research 23: 1072-1075

 

Corleto A, Cazzato E, Laudadio V and Petrera F 2005 Evolution of biomass and quality of safflower during the reproductive stage for hay and ensiling purposes. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Safflower Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 69-73

 

Corleto A, Cazzato E, Tufarelli V, Dario M and Laudario V 2008 The effect of harvest date on the yield and forage quality of ensiling safflower biomass. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Safflower Conference, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia, pp. 1-6

 

Duncan D B 1955 Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11: 1-42

 

French A V, O’Rourke P K and Cameron D G 1988 Beef production from forage crops in the Brigalow region of Central Queensland: 2. Winter forage crops. Tropical Grasslands 22: 85-90

 

Gecgel U, Demirci M, Esendal E and Tasan M 2007 Fatty acid composition of the oil from developing seeds of different varieties of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 84: 47-54

 

Hamrouni I, Touati S, Dhifi W, Chahed T, Ayachi S, Salah H and Marzouk B 2004 Glycerolipid evolution during safflower seed formation and ripening. Journal of Food Lipids 11: 297-311

 

Hara A and Radin N S 1978 Lipid extraction of tissues with a low-toxicity solvent. Analytical Biochemistry 90: 420-426

 

Harris P and James A T 1969 Effect of low temperature on fatty acid biosynthesis in seeds. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 187: 13-18

 

Hill A B and Knowles P F 1968 Fatty acid composition of the oil of developing seeds of different varieties of safflower. Crop Science 8: 275-277

 

Knowles P F 1976 Safflower. In: Evolution of Crop Plants, ed. by Simmonds NW, Longman, London, UK, pp. 31–33

 

Knowles P F 1989 Safflower. In: Oil crops of the world, ed. by Downey RK, Robbelen G and Ashri A, New York, USA, pp. 363-374

 

Kott R W, Hatfield P G, Bergmanb J W, Flynn C R, Van Wagoner H and Boles J A 2003 Feedlot performance, carcass composition, and muscle and fat CLA concentrations of lambs fed diets supplemented with safflower seeds.  Small Ruminant Research 49: 11–17

 

Koutroubas, S D and Papadoska D K 2005 Adaptation, grain yield and oil content of safflower in Greece. In: Proceeding of the 6th International Safflower Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 161-167

 

Ladd S L and Knowles P F 1970 Inheritance of stearic acid in the seed oil of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Crop Science 10: 525-527

 

Lammoglia M A, Bellows R A, Grings E E, Bergman J W, Short R E and MacNeil M D 1997 Effects of dietary fat composition and content, breed, and calf sex on birth weight, dystocia, calf vigor, and postpartum reproduction of first calf beef heifers. Proceedings, Western Section, American Society of Animal Science 48: 81–83

 

Landau S, Friedman S, Brenner S, Bruckental I, Weinberg Z G, Ashbell G, Hen Y, Dvash L and Leshem Y 2004 The value of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) hay and silage grown under Mediterranean conditions as forage for dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 88: 263-271

 

Landau S, Molle G, Fois N, Friedman S, Barkai D, Decandia M, Cabiddu A, Dvash L and Sitzia M 2005 Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) as a novel pasture species for dairy sheep in the Mediterranean conditions of Sardinia and Israel. Small Ruminant Research 59: 239–249

 

Leshem Y, Brukental I, Landau S, Ashbell G and Weinberg ZG 2001 Safflower – a promising forage crop for semi-arid regions. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Grassland Congress, Sao Pedro, Sao Paulo, Brazil, pp. 303-304

 

Leshem Y, Brukental I, Landau S, Ashbell G, Weinberg ZG and Brosh A 2000 Safflower – new forage crop in Israel. Meshek Habakar Vehachalav 286: 27-32

 

McKillican M E and Sims R A 1963 Lipid changes in maturing oil-bearing plants. III. Changes in lipid classes in flax and safflower oils. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 40: 108-113

 

Nagaraj G and Reddy P S 1997 Some factors influencing safflower seed and oil quality. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Safflower Conference, Bari, Italy, pp. 347-349

 

Peiretti P G and Gai F 2009 Fatty acid and nutritive quality of chia (Salvia hispanica L.) seeds and plant during growth. Animal Feed Science and Technology 148: 267-275

 

Peiretti P G and Meineri G 2006 Fatty acids, chemical composition and organic matter digestibility of seeds and vegetative parts of false flax (Camelina sativa L.) after different lengths of growth. Animal Feed Science and Technology 133: 341-350

 

Peiretti P G and Meineri G 2008 Chemical composition, organic matter digestibility and fatty acid content of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) harvested at five stages of growth. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 88: 1850-1854

 

Peiretti P G, Palmegiano G B and Masoero G 2004 Chemical composition, organic matter digestibility and fatty acid content of evening primrose (Oenothera paradoxa) during its growth cycle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 116: 293-299

 

Quiroga A R, Daz-Zorita M and Buschiazzo D E 2001 Safflower productivity as related to soil water storage and management practices in semiarid regions. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 32: 2851–2862

 

Rahamatalla A B, Babiker E E, Krishna A G and El Tinay A H 1998 Changes in chemical composition, minerals and amino acids during seed growth and development of four safflower cultivars. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 52: 161-170

 

Scholljegerdes E J, Hess B W, Moss G E, Hixon D L and Rule D C 2004 Influence of supplemental cracked high-linoleate or high-oleate safflower seeds on site and extent of digestion in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 82: 3577-3588 http://jas.fass.org/cgi/reprint/82/12/3577

 

Sims R A, Mc Gregor W G, Plessers A G and Mes J C 1961 Lipid changes in maturing oil bearing plants. II. Changes in fatty acid composition of flax and safflower seed oils Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 38: 276-279

 

Stanford K, Wallins G L, Lees B M and Mndel H H 2001 Feeding value of immature safflower forage for dry ewes. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 81: 289- 292 http://article.pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/ppv/RPViewDoc?issn=1918-1825&volume=81&issue=2&startPage=289

 

Tilley J M A and Terry R A 1963 A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18: 104-111

 

Van Soest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A 1991 Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583-3591 http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/74/10/3583.pdf

 

Velasco L and Fernandez-Martinez J M 2001 Breeding for oil quality in safflower. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Safflower Conference, Williston, North Dakota and Sidney, Montana, USA, pp. 133-137

 

Vonghia G, Pinto F, Ciruzzi B and Montemurro O 1992 ‘‘In vivo’’ digestibility and nutritive value of safflower utilized as fodder crop cultivated in Southern Italy. In: Livestock in the Mediterranean Cereal Production Systems, ed. by Guessous F, Kabbali A and Narjisse H, Pudoc Scientific Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 127-129

 

Weinberg Z G, Ashbell G, Hen Y, Leshem Y, Landau Y S and Brukental I 2002 A note on ensiling safflower forage. Grass and Forage Science 57: 184-187

 

Weinberg Z G, Bar-Tal A, Chen Y, Gamburg M, Brener S, Dvash L, Markovitz T and Landau S 2006 The effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization on the ensiling of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius). Animal Feed Science and Technology 134:152-161

 

Yau S K 2007 Winter versus spring sowing of rain-fed safflower in a semi-arid, high-elevation Mediterranean environment.  European Journal of Agronomy 26: 249–256



Received 8 October 2009; Accepted 26 October 2009; Published 3 December 2009

Go to top