Livestock Research for Rural Development 18 (10) 2006 Guidelines to authors LRRD News

Citation of this paper

Phenotypic and genetic parameters of reproductive traits for Ayrshire cattle on large-scale farms in Kenya

J O Amimo*, R O Mosi , J W Wakhungu, T K Muasya and B O Inyangala

Department of Animal Production, University of Nairobi, P.O Box 29053 00625 Nairobi Kenya
*Corresponding author (address PO Box 7256-00200 Nairobi Kenya, 0722 507 957)
amimodr@yahoo.com


Abstract

Data consisting of 2757 records from ten Kenyan Ayrshire herds made between 1980 and 2005 were used to examine environmental factors affecting age at first calving (AFC) and calving intervals (CI) and consequently estimate genetic and phenotypic parameters and trends.

The overall means and standard errors for AFC and CI were 39.4 ± 7.2 months and 487.5 ± 151.6 days respectively. The respective heritability estimates were 0.091 ± 0.05 and 0.044 ± 0.032, while the repeatability estimate for CI was 0.096 ± 0.001. The genetic trends for CI and AFC were -0.6d/yr and -0.01mo/yr respectively and were both significant (P<0.001), indicating a decrease in mean breeding value over the study period. Phenotypic trends were -0.31 mo/yr and -0.35 d/yr for AFC and CI respectively though non-significant (P>0.05).

The low heritability for CI and AFC indicated that temporary environmental influences were much greater than genetic influences or permanent environmental influences on these traits.

Key words: Age at first calving, Ayrshire, calving interval, genetic parameters and trends


Introduction

Most of the current breeding programs globally use indices that give more weight to yield and type traits than reproductive traits (Lucy 2001). This practice has resulted in substantial genetic progress for yield, but is likely to cause reduced fertility given the reported positive genetic correlation between fertility and yield (Hansen et al 1983; Raheja et al 1989; Oltenacu et al 1991). Several studies demonstrated an inverse relationship between reproductive efficiency and milk yield especially in the tropics (Lucy 2001, Ojango and Pollot 2001, Roth 2004). Management can enhance reproductive efficiency, even though reproduction has some genetic variation (Lucy 2001; Biffani et al 2003).

Low fertility is of economic importance in dairy enterprises especially in tropics, because it results in higher levels of involuntary replacement, slippage in calving pattern, veterinary intervention and reduced annual milk production (Esslemont and Peeler 1993). Improving fertility also increases effectiveness of treatments or vaccinations and also reduces breeding costs because of isolation, treatment, culling and replacement of problem cows (Campos et al 1994, Damatawewa and Berger 1998).

Evidence in literature (Njubi 1990; Rege 1991; Lucy 2001; Biffani et al 2003) shows that heritabilities of reproductive traits in dairy cattle are generally low, making selection for those traits difficult. However there is sufficient variation to permit genetic improvement of reproductive performance. Thus incorporation of measures of cow (daughter) reproduction into sire selection decisions has been recommended (Clay et al 2000; Weigel and Rekaya 2000).

The low heritability was interpreted by Hansen et al (1983) to mean that natural selection has reduced the additive genetic variance and little improvement through selection can be expected. Phillipson (1981) and Raheja et al (1989) on the other hand, inferred that considerable additive genetic variation is associated with fertility traits. Hansen et al (1983) pointed out that although selection for reproduction is possible, it would lead to loss in production and the only best economic alternative to apply selection for fertility would be to hold days open constant in cows.

A significant increase to productivity could therefore be feasible by paying attention to problems of reproductive inefficiency (Mukasa-Mugerwa et al 1992). Hence, Mukasa-Mugerwa et al 1992 reported that an important starting point in any animal improvement package is to assess the reproductive performance of the herd. The objectives of this study were to determine the environmental factors limiting reproductive traits in Kenya Ayrshire cattle and to estimate phenotypic and genetic parameters and trends for CI and AFC over recent years.


Materials and methods

Data Source and preparation

Data comprising of 8301 lactation records were sourced from 10 large-scale Ayrshire herds covered by the Dairy Record Services of Kenya (DRSK) and the Kenya Stud Book (KSB). Herds were located in the Rift Valley and Central Provinces of Kenya, which are classified as high and medium potential for agricultural production. The management system of the herds differed but generally animals were managed according to their age groups i.e. calves, weaners and mature stock. From the age of 14 months heifers coming on oestrus regularly were served through artificial Insemination. On average, most of the farms tried to have their heifers inseminated at 18 months of age. Calving occurred all year round but most cows were planned to calve towards end of the year when demand for milk was high and to capitalize on the long rains in early part of the subsequent year.

Rainfall data for different study areas were obtained from the Meteorological Department in Nairobi. Monthly rainfall totals over study period (1980-2005) were used to determine the rainfall pattern to define the three seasons. The seasons in the country were generally classified into three based on rainfall pattern (Rege ad Mosi 1989): Long rains, (March to May), Short rains (October to November) and Dry seasons (June -September and December-February).

Records of animals without pedigree information and dates of birth and calving were excluded. All cows with AFC earlier than 23 months and records of calving intervals shorter than 300 days were also omitted. This ensured that records that were wrongly entered at the farms resulting in impractically early AFC and short CI were not included in the analysis. The records were edited down to 2674 records of 1151 cows sired by 171 bulls. Pedigree records for individual cows were verified with records from KSB, which issues certificate of registration showing dates of birth, sire, dam and grandparents.

The age at the first calving was derived from the dates of birth and first calving, while the calving interval was derived from the dates of consecutive calvings i.e. current and previous calvings.

Statistical data analyses

The data were first analysed by the least squares techniques using the general linear models procedure of SAS (SAS 1989) to determine the effects of the various factors on reproductive traits. CI and AFC were analysed using models 1 and 2 respectively;

pi = the fixed effect of the ith parity (I= 1,2,……….5),

hj = the fixed effect of jth herd (j=1,2,………10),

yk= the fixed effect of kth year of calving (k=1986,1987…2005),
sl
= the fixed effect of lth season of calving (l=1,2,3),

eikllm = the random residual NID (0,σ2e)

 

From the preliminary analysis a suitable model was identified for the final estimation of the genetic parameters. The final statistical analyses were performed with DF-REML procedure (Meyer 1989) and animal model to obtain variance components for calving interval and age at first calving. The animal model included additive genetic merit of each cow as the only random effect. To estimate repeatability for calving interval, an animal model was used to account for permanent environmental effects common to the repeated records on the same animal.

Estimation of phenotypic, genetic and environmental trends was done for CI and AFC. The mean additive genotype in a particular year of birth was defined as the mean predicted breeding values of cows born in that year. Consequently, changes of mean additive genotype between the years reflected additive genotypic differences. The overall additive genetic trend in a trait was estimated by regressing the mean predicted breeding values on the respective year of birth in that trait. For phenotypic trends, the adjusted performance records were averaged within year of birth and then regressed on years of birth (Wakhungu 1988; Rege and Mosi 1989). The within year difference between the mean predicted breeding value and the mean of the adjusted phenotypic records reflected the component due to the non-additive genetic and the environment. These were also regressed on year of birth for the period of study to reflect the environmental trend.


Result and discussion

Means and variations

From the analysis with model 1 and 2 showed that herd, parity, year of birth/calving had significant effects (P<0.01) on CI and AFC. This reflects the importance influence of management and nutrition on the fertility traits. The overall means of AFC and CI were 39.4 ± 7.2 months and 487.5 ± 151.6 days respectively (Table 1).


Table 1.  Data structure and means and standard deviations for fertility traits

Data structure

Number

CI

AFC

Records

2674

1544

Cows

1151

1499

Sires with progeny

171

189

Traits Mean

487.5 151.6

39.4 7.2

Coefficient of variation, %

29.7

15.5


CI had a moderate coefficient of variation (29.6%), even though the mean was longer than the biologically ideal CI of about 365 days, while AFC had low coefficient of variation (15.4%). These results were in agreement with the earlier reports in literature (Campos et al 1994; Okeyo and Mosi 1999; Ojango 2000). Early age at first calving (22 - 23 months) followed by minimum calving interval has been reported to increase the productive life of a cow this has the added effect of shortening the generation interval thereby improving the annual genetic gain.

Effects of non-genetic factors on reproductive traits

Herd had a significant influence (p<0.001) on calving interval. Similar results have been reported in literature (Rege 1991; Campos et al 1994; Kaya 1996). The variation of CI from one herd to another could be attributed to differences in skills of heat detection. Therefore, an intensive program of heat detection and practices of insemination may significantly shorten CI by shortening days open. Age at first calving, which is an indicator for age at sexual maturity and age at first service, was significantly affected by herd (p<0.01). Ojango and Pollot (2001) have reported similar results.

Effects of year of calving on CI were significant (p<0.001), similarly significant effect of year of birth on AFC was reported in this study. The year of birth/calving effects are the result of the interaction of a set of environmental, technical and administrative management practices makes its interpretation difficult, however, it is important source of variation that must be considered in the statistical analysis in order to get clear interpretation of results. Significant year of calving effects on CI have been reported in several studies made in Kenya (Rege and Mosi 1989, Rege 1991; Musani 1995; Muasya 2005).

The parity had a significant influence on CI (p<0.05). The first parity cow had the longest CI, and a declining trend with advancing parity was observed. This was due to the increase in the body weight combined with advancing age when body is fully developed followed by increase in function of most body systems including reproductive system. These results were in agreement with other earlier reports (Lusweti and Mpofu 1989; Chagunda et al 2004; Muasya 2005).

Heritability and repeatability

The estimated additive genetic, residual and phenotypic variances, heritability and standard errors for CI and AFC are presented in Table 2.


Table 2.   Additive genetic, phenotypic and relative permanent environmental variances, heritability and repeatability for CI and AFC

Parameter

AFC

CI

Additive-genetic variance

2.96

898

Variance due to permanent cow effect

-

1128

Error variance

33.59

19113

Phenotypic variance

36.55

21140

Phenotypic CVs, %

15.5

29.7

Heritability

0.09 0.05

0.04 0.03

C-squared value

-

0.05

Repeatability

-

0.09 0.001


The heritability estimates for CI and AFC were consistent with those reported in other studies (Rege 1991; Makuza and McDaniel 1996; Baco et al 1998; Ojango and Pollot 2001) despite the differences in data, cattle populations and estimation procedures used. Reproductive traits general have low heritabilities than production traits. Other workers have reported high heritabilities (as high as 0.47) for some reproductive traits like AFC (Chagunda et al 2004, Ojango and Pollot 2001; Makuza and McDaniel 1996; Baco et al 1998).

The low heritability estimates obtained in this study for CI and AFC were due to low additive genetic variance attributable to long term natural selection in the breed. The effect of large environmental variance on the phenotypic variance also led to low heritability. Poor heat detection and insemination techniques are important contributors to increased phenotypic variance of these traits. The effect of nutrition on heifer's growth rate and silent heat, hence increased number of insemination per conception and insemination period, has been reported (Harrison et al 1990, Dechow et al 2004). The low heritability estimates for CI and AFC obtained in this study indicates that little genetic improvement would be expected from selection for such traits. Although the heritabilities were low, there was exploitable genetic variance in these traits as observed in variance component estimation (Table 2) Therefore, improving managerial techniques such as feeding, heat detection, insemination services and use of high quality semen, should lead to considerable decrease in length of CI and AFC.

Phenotypic and genetic trends

The overall genetic trend in CI and AFC were as desired negative and significant (P<0.001), indicating a decrease in calving interval and age at first calving over time (Figure 1 and 2).


Figure 1.  Phenotypic and genetic trends for age at first calving (months)  [Y = -0.223x + 41.2],
genetic trend:
[y =-0.0143x+0.0125]

Figure 2.  Phenotypic and genetic trends for calving interval (days)  [Y= -0.276x + 497.9],
genetic trend:
[y =-0.569x+5.57].


The regression coefficients of mean breeding value for CI and AFC on year of birth were -0.57 d/yr and -0.01 mo/yr respectively. Thus, this means that breeding values for CI and AFC decreased during the study period at the rate of 0.6 d/yr and 0.01 mo/yr respectively. The corresponding phenotypic trends too were also negative but non-significant (P>0.05). These results are consistent with other reports in literature (Rege 1991; Ojango and Pollot 2001), but were not in agreement with reports by Njubi et al (1992) and Musani (1995) who reported positive genetic and phenotypic trends.

Within year difference between the mean predicted breeding value and the mean of the adjusted phenotypic records reflected the component that was attributed to the non-additive genetic component and the environment. The environmental trends for CI and AFC obtained in this study were 0.29 d/yr and -0.21, which were statistically not significantly different from zero.


Conclusions


Reference

Baco S, H Harada and R Fukuhara 1998 Genetic relationship of body measurements, at registration to a couple of reproductive traits in Japanese black cows. Animal Science and Technology 69 (1): 1 -7

Biffani S, A B Samore, F Canavesi and M Marusi 2003 Data quality assessment and preliminary investigations on fertility in the Italian Holstein Friesian. Interbull Bulletin No. 30. Proceedings of the Interbull Technical Workshop. Beltsville, MD, USA. March 2-3, 2003. Pp 89-95

Campos M S, Wilcox CJ, Becerril C M and A Diaz 1994 Genetic parameters for yield and reproductive parameters of Holstein and Jersey cattle in Florida . Journal of Dairy Science 77: 867-873. http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/77/3/867

Chagunda M G G, Bruns E W, Wollny C B A and King H M 2004 E ffect of milk yield-based selection on some reproductive traits of Holstein Fresian cows on large scale dairy farms in Malawi; Livestock Research for Rural Development 16(7): 20-32. http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd16/7/chag16047.htm

Clay J S, McDaniel B T and Brown C H 2000 Reliability of progeny tests for reproductive traits computed from DHI data. Journal of Dairy Science 83 (Supplement 1): 61. (Abstract)

Damatawewa C M B and P J Berger 1998 Genetic and phenotypic parameters for 305-day yield fertility and survival in Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 2700 - 2719. http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/81/10/2700

Dechow C D, Rogers G W, Klei L, Lawlor T J and VanRaden P M 2004 Body Condition Scores and Dairy Form Evaluations as Indicators of Days Open in US Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 87(10): 3534 - 3541. http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/87/10/3534

Esslemont R J and E J Peeler 1993 the scope for raising margins in dairy herds by improving fertility and health. British Veterinary Journal 149: 537-547

Hansen L B, Freeman A E and P J Berger 1983 Yield and fertility relationships in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 66:293-305.

Harrison R O, Ford S P, Young J W and Conley A J 1990 Increased milk production versus reproductive and energy status of high producing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 73:2749-2758. http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/73/10/2749

Kaya I 1996 Parameter estimates for persistency of lactations and relationships of persistency and milk yield in Holstein cattle. PhD Thesis, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey

Lucy M C 2001 Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: Where will it end? Journal of Dairy Science 84:1277-1293. http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/84/6/1277.pdf

Lusweti E C and Mpofu N 1989 A study of Holstein-Friesian and Jersey breed performance in Zimbambwe. A comparison of performance of Holstein-Friesian and Jersey. Tropical Animal Health and Production (Special issue) 43-49.

Makuza S M and McDaniel B T 1996 Effect of days dry, previous days open, and current days open on milk yields of cows in Zimbabwe and North Carolina. Journal of Dairy Science 79:702 - 709

Meyer K 1989 Restricted maximum likelihood to estimate variance components for animal models with several random effects using derivative free algorithms. Genetic, Selection and Evolution 21: 318.

Muasya T K 2005 Genetic evaluation of the dairy cattle herd at the University of Nairobi Veterinary Farm, MSc thesis, University of Nairobi

Mukasa-Mugerwa E, Mutiga E R and Girma A 1992 Studies on the reproductive performance of Ethiopian sheep by means of Enzyme Immunoassay Technique; Review. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 4:523-32.

Musani S K 1995 Evaluation of a Jersey cow herd in the upper midland agro-ecological zone: Genetic and Phenotypic trends. MSc. Thesis. Egerton University.

Njubi D M 1990 Characterization of purebred Jersey cattle performance in coastal sub-humid Kenya. MSc. thesis, University of Nairobi.

Njubi D M, Rege J E O, Thorne W, Collins-Lusweti E and Nyambaka R 1992 Genetic and environmental variation in reproductive and lactational performance of Jersey cattle in the coastal lowland semi-humid tropics. Tropical Animal Health and Production 24(4):231-41

Ojango J M 2000 Performance of Holstein-Friesian cattle in Kenya and the potential for genetic improvement using international breeding values. PhD thesis. Wye University College, University of London.

Ojango J M K and Pollot G E 2001 Genetics of milk yield and fertility in Holstein-Friesian cattle on large-scale Kenyan farms. Animal Science 79: 1742-1750.

Okeyo A M and Mosi R O 1999 Performance of Dutch Friesian cows under semi-arid conditions of Kenya: reproductive performance and productive life. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa 47, 87, 87-95.

Oltenacu P A, Frick A and Lindhe B 1991 Relationship of fertility to milk yields in Swedish cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 74:264-268 http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/74/1/264

Philipsson J 1981 Genetic aspects of female fertility in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 8:307-319.

Raheja K L, Burnside E B and Schaeffer L R 1989 Heifer fertility and its relationship with cow fertility and production traits in Holstein dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 2665-2669.

Rege J E O 1991 Genetic analysis of reproductive performance of Friesian cattle in Kenya. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 108: 412-423

Rege J E O and Mosi R O 1989 Analysis of the Kenyan Friesian breed from 1968 to 1984: genetic and environmental trends and related parameters of milk production. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa 37:267

Roth A 2004 Genetic evaluation for female fertility in dairy cattle in the Nordic countries. ICAR Special Workshop entitled "Addressing the Decline in Reproductive Performance", Sousse Tunisia, June 1, 2004.

SAS Institute Inc. 1989 SAS/STAT User's Guide, version 6, Fourth Edition, Volume 2, Cary, NC, USA

Wakhungu J W 1988 Phenotypic, genetic and environmental trends inn Kenya Sahiwal cattle. MSc. thesis, University of Nairobi

Weigel K A and Rekaya R 2000 Genetic parameters for reproductive traits of Holstein cattle in California and Minnesota dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 83:1072-1080. http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/83/5/1072


Received 5 July 2006; Accepted 22 August 2006; Published 3 October 2006

Go to top